Good on you Ryan.

I made hbase-2099 for discussion of moving hbase to maven (There is already
HBASE-1403 on moving src/contribs out of hbase).

Unless I get a -1 soon, I'll go ahead with the hbase-1433 commit.

St.Ack


On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryano...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm ok with the ivy thing, I just wanted to raise the non-disconnected
> build issue, since moving to ivy is not 'no cost' as proponents would
> like to paper over. I just wanted to make sure everyone realizes this
> will hurt productivity of some people.
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:52 PM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryano...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> So given all that, I'd rather do the whole hog, rather than the half
> >> and half thing. Ie: maven over ivy.
> >>
> >
> >
> > I'm not opposed to a move to Maven. I've not really given it much
> thought,
> > but I think that a separate discussion and undertaking.  It would take
> some
> > work doing it properly.  We would need to take on the maven layout at a
> > minimum -- move all to src/main/java, etc. -- and we'd need to purge any
> > deviation from the maven way because the alternative is hours burnt
> > wandering in the weeds of poorly documented plugin xml configs., or
> worse,
> > hours writing custom maven plugins to pull Maven in alternate directions.
> >  For one, our notion of contrib (src/contrib/*), IIRC, does not map to
> > maven's notion of subprojects. Its been a while but with Maven
> subprojects
> > notion, you could not without backflips have the parent project build its
> > jar and then have subprojects depend on parent.
> >
> > If someone wants to take on the Maven work, well and good but for me the
> Ivy
> > work is done.  Lets commit it.  The way it does its dependencies is
> > Maven-like (you list them in pom for maven, in properties for ivy; both
> pull
> > to local caches, etc.).  Committing Ivy gets us working with external
> > repositories, pulling and publishing.  So, the ivy commit takes us some
> of
> > the ways toward a mavenized hbase while meantime, making hbase build like
> > its hosting project and its siblings.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
>

Reply via email to