[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12801498#action_12801498
]
stack commented on HBASE-2141:
------------------------------
For me, I'm not that mad about doing dev on hadoop rpc, or our subclass of it.
I think we should start over. Start with an nio2-based rpc. Growing the
children as per apache1 or bounding the threads allowed in as per apache2 can
be a feature of the new rpc.
> Flexible thread pool for RPC server
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-2141
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2141
> Project: Hadoop HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andrew Purtell
> Fix For: 0.21.0
>
>
> Having a bounded thread pool is important, so availability can degrade
> gracefully (more or less), as opposed to the whole regionserver becoming
> livelocked. But, we don't need for the pool to be preallocated as is done
> currently. How about changing the RPC server thread pool such that the user
> can specify a minimum and maximum number of handler threads? The pool would
> start with the minimum, allocate more up to the max to handle additional
> concurrency, then terminate unused threads after some time back down to the
> minimum. Then we can do things like set a maximum of 100 handlers or such
> without taking on the overhead of 100 threads until it is needed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.