On 10/02/2010, at 4:31 AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Forgot to mention that a layout like this:
>
>
> hbase/
> contrib/
> stargate/
> src/
> embedded/
> main/
> servlet/
>
> would only be for 0.20.4, assuming we have one. In 0.21, Stargate is
> getting merged back into core.
>
> So this is why I haven't done something like the above. Is it worth
> the time?
oh. pardon my ignorance, when is 0.21 targetted then? I'm just basing my
plans off trunk at the moment, and stargate is still showing as a contrib
module? Is there a different branch I should be looking at ? Or is it just
planning stage? maybe I should not concentrate much effort in stargate until
the merge into core.
if stargate has (or will) been moved to the core, this will probably simplify
things anyway. If we still wish to have a standalone packaged WAR file, we can
still do that, it could sit as a top-level hbase module, depend on hbase-core
(which now contains stargate) and just package up the web.xml that is needed.
A separate standalone sh-launched-jetty appassembler bundle is also easily
doable too as an extension to that.
so, in directory speak, something like:
hbase/
core
stargate/
servlet (or something like that)
standalone
contrib/
ec2
transaction
...etc...
'embedded' would not be needed, because hbase-core would just contain the stuff
you need (if I'm reading what you're saying correctly).
thanks muchly for the response!
Paul
