On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Ryan Rawson <ryano...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have a 4th option :-) I'm on the his right now and ill write it up when > I > get to work. In short move the zk thread out of the rs into a monitoring > parent and then you can explicitly monitor for Juliet gc pauses. More to > come.... > I don't think that will be correct - it might be mostly correct, but "Juliet gc pauses" are just an extra long version of what happens all the time. ZK is asynchronous, so we will never find out immediately if we've been killed. There can always be an arbitrarily long pause in between looking at ZK state and taking an action. -Todd > > On Mar 17, 2010 10:22 AM, "Karthik Ranganathan" <kranganat...@facebook.com > > > wrote: > > Loved the "Juliet" terminology as well :). > > @Todd: I agree we will need something like #2 or especially #3 in other > places. > > Looks like we have a consensus - I will update the JIRA. > > > Thanks > Karthik > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Todd Lipcon [mailto:t...@cloudera.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 10:09 PM > To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: HBASE-2312 discu... > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:08 PM,... > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
