I'm cool with an rc, but what is our timeline for testing? Given we just committed 2248, which is a pretty huge change, I think we should let it soak for developers for at least a week or so before moving from rc to release?
-Todd On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > Unless objection, I was going to put up a 0.20.4 Release Candidate 1 > made from the tip of the 0.20_pre_durability branch tomorrow. > > Andrew, I was thinking you could level your ec2 guns at the RC or, > would you rather me wait and let you go at the tip of the branch > first? Just say. > > Anything else we need to get in before I cut the candidate? > Thanks, > St.Ack > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryano...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I like this. With no durability goal, we should be able to hit this in > > short order. HDFS is not ready for the claim as of yet. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> I went through the list issues that we had filed against a 0.20.4. I > >> moved out the issues that depend on hdfs-200, post rpc-version change, > >> etc. Outstanding are ~15 issues: http://su.pr/1TLvb7 A good few are > >> patch available. A couple of others are small doc issues. I'll take > >> care of the easy ones this evening. Please go over the list > >> yourselves to see what else we should include. As is, the list > >> includes hbase-2248. I think we should try and get this one in if > >> only to make the release a little interesting (and to fix the > >> deadlock). We also need to fix the json jar issue so we have chance > >> of being debian package. > >> > >> St.Ack > >> P.S. I haven't voted yet. At the moment I'm +0. If hbase-2248 goes > >> in, I'd go +1. > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >>> Implied is we move people to 0.20.5 rather than do a patch on 0.20.4, > beyond the RC period. > >>> > >>> Hence it's even more important that J-D cherry pick bugfixes out of > 0.20.4-dev for an 0.20.4 RC and release. > >>> > >>> Is that acceptable? > >>> > >>> - Andy > >>> > >>> > >>>> From: Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > >>>> Subject: Re: Vote on 0.20.3.1 > >>>> To: "hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org" <hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org> > >>>> Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010, 3:35 PM > >>>> > From: Jonathan Gray > >>>> > > >>>> > The issue would be that we break out 0.20.4 to make an > >>>> RC. > >>>> > Now we have to patch 3 separate trees for each bug fix > >>>> (0.20.4, > >>>> > 0.20.5, and 0.21). > >>>> > >>>> Ok, I grant you that. But only during the RC. > >>>> > >>>> - Andy > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
