On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:25 AM, tsuna <tsuna...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> The primary disruption to developers will be when the subversion >> repository is renamed. We'll send out a note before we do this, then > > Technically, I don't think the repository gets renamed. It's just a > matter of moving a directory in the tree with `svn mv'. >
Yes >> developers can use 'svn switch' to update their repos (There is no >> apache git repo that I know of... I asked just in case) > > I hope the read-only Git repos will get updated to track the new path > too. I wish we could use this opportunity to switch to Git entirely. > Who knows. Might be a miracle in apache infrastructure between here and our move. >> One other issue is the wiki. I don't think it's easy to rename a >> subtree from a Moin Moin wiki to a new wiki. Fortunately we don't >> have many wiki pages and could cut and paste them manually. > > I'm sure we can also script that. > Yes. Though could also be spring cleaning opportunity. >> Alternately, we could switch to using confluence for our wiki. > > I'm against this. Confluence = Proprietary Software. Plus, many > people I talked to who've used it complained about its UI and wiki > syntax. And I think it makes more sense to stay on what we already > know and use, instead of spending time migrating the contents to a > different kind of wiki. > I was for confluence because it 'cleaner' but thanks for the above, in particular the reminder that there's work doing the convertion. St.Ack
