On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:44 PM, Jonathan Gray <jg...@facebook.com> > wrote: > > Now might also be the time to think about breaking from hadoop numbering > (I think this idea has been floating around since the first version we > synced). > > > > We've already agreed to break client compatibility for 0.20.5 and it's > more than a minor revision. And I'm sure we'll have another release between > 0.20.5 and 0.21. > > > > So, the new version could be 0.21 but thats not 'breaking from hadoop > numbering' and it can't be 1.0.0 .... yet. What should it be? 0.99.0 > is kinda dumb. 0.3.0? (We went as far as 0.2.0 on old numbering > system). 0.3.0 will be less than 0.21.0 so will mess w/ packaging > systems. 0.30.0? > > Both deb and RPM have the concept of a version epoch, so we can make 0.3.0 > 0.20 if we like.
However, it might be confusing for users nonetheless. > > > It's also clear that this is going to be by far our most solid release to > date and so might be worthy of new shiny versioning/packaging as a TLP. > Website/docs/wiki refresher to boot. > > > > Changing the package names is way more invasive to client code but I'm > always +1 on making stuff shorter. > > Might have to keep around the old stuff deprecated. > > St.Ack > > > > > > > Anyways, I'm not doing much production cluster maintenance these days so > these changes would impact me way less than others. Will welcome pushback > if you guys don't want to deal with this. > > > > JG > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Ryan Rawson [mailto:ryano...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:20 PM > >> To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: HBase move to Apache Top Level Project > >> > >> I am somewhat interested in this :-) > >> > >> But it can make life difficult for our users... thoughts people? > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Karthik K <oss....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > This is great news. Congrats HBase team. > >> > > >> > (Does this mean, the packages would be refactored as o.a.hbase.* in > >> the > >> > trunk ? ). > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Karthik. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Cosmin Lehene <cleh...@adobe.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> This is great news! > >> >> > >> >> On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:32 PM, Stack wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > The board yesterday passed a resolution making HBase a TLP. > >> >> > > >> >> > I filed an infrastructure issue to start the move: > >> >> > > >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2641 > >> >> > > >> >> > The primary disruption to developers will be when the subversion > >> >> > repository is renamed. We'll send out a note before we do this, > >> then > >> >> > developers can use 'svn switch' to update their repos (There is no > >> >> > apache git repo that I know of... I asked just in case) > >> >> > > >> >> We already use the apache git.apache.org mirror for HBase. I've also > >> seen > >> >> the GitHub mirror http://github.com/apache/hbase and thought there > >> might > >> >> be some plans for migration. > >> >> > >> >> > One other issue is the wiki. I don't think it's easy to rename a > >> >> > subtree from a Moin Moin wiki to a new wiki. Fortunately we don't > >> >> > have many wiki pages and could cut and paste them manually. > >> >> > Alternately, we could switch to using confluence for our wiki. > >> >> > Thoughts? > >> >> > > >> >> Confluence has a good integration with Jira (being both developed by > >> >> Atlassian). It's functionally advanced and looks better. So +1 for > >> that as > >> >> well. > >> >> > >> >> Cosmin > >> >> > >> >> > St.Ack > >> >> > (Above shamelessly a copy of Doug's mail to the Avro list) > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
