Sorry for the JIRA storm that just passed. I went over the CHANGES.txt and what was filed against 0.20.4 up in JIRA. There were discrepancies (Mainly, we should have also branched in JIRA when we branched in SVN). I also found some mis-numberings of issues and even a few other issues that should have been in 0.20.4 but we'd missed (e.g. hbase-2381).
A new RC coming soon.... St.Ack On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: >> Not sure if it's a blocker, but HBASE-2378 doesn't seem to be in the >> pre_durability branch, though the HTML version of the release notes says it >> is (it's not in CHANGES.txt either) >> > > I agree HBASE-2378 an important fix that should be in 0.20.4 (making a > partitioner is hard enough w/o there being this dirty bug in > ImmutableBytesWritable atop it all). > > I have also found other discrepencies between CHANGES.txt and whats > labelled 0.20.4 in JIRA. > > Let me fix the above and then roll new RC. > > Thanks for review, > St.Ack > >> (I know we have at least a couple customers for whom HFileOutputFormat is >> useless without this patch) >> >> I'll give the rc a go on my test cluster this week. >> >> -Todd >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> >>> I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 3 here: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-3/ >>> >>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4? >>> >>> It includes some critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See >>> CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for the list of 112 >>> issues addressed by this candidate). >>> >>> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes >>> Thursday, the 29th of April. >>> >>> Yours, >>> Your HBase Team >>> >>> 1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12314496 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Lipcon >> Software Engineer, Cloudera >> >
