VOTE PASSES because 4x+1 && !-1s Let me publish RC5 as 0.20.4. Thanks to all who tested, St.Ack
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Ryan Rawson <ryano...@gmail.com> wrote: > I used the Import mapreduce to pull in 16GB of data and things looked fine. > > -ryan > > On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >> +1 >> >> Loaded 1B using PE into 5node cluster. Did scans and reads. No >> noticeable issues. Downloaded it. Made sure it runs in local mode. >> Ran PE against it (I think the ZK disconnect WARN message cleaned up >> in zk 3.3). Doc looks fine. >> >> St.Ack >> >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Todd Lipcon <t...@cloudera.com> wrote: >>> +1, I ran a small data load overnight of about 1.2B rows (~88GB) on my 5 >>> node cluster. Grepped logs for anything suspicious looking, everything looks >>> good. >>> >>> -Todd >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans >>> <jdcry...@apache.org>wrote: >>> >>>> +1: doc is good, passes unit tests, passes my own stress testing. >>>> >>>> J-D >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: >>>> > I've posted an hbase 0.20.4 release candidate 5 here: >>>> > >>>> > http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/ >>>> > >>>> > It includes a fix for the issue J-D found offlining big tables. >>>> > >>>> > Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.4? >>>> > >>>> > It includes critical fixes and some performance enhancements (See >>>> > CHANGES.txt or the release notes in the docs [1] for issues addressed >>>> > by this candidate). >>>> > >>>> > Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes >>>> > Saturday, the 1st of May. >>>> > >>>> > Yours, >>>> > Your HBase Team >>>> > >>>> > 1. >>>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.4-candidate-5/hbase-0.20.4/docs/releasenotes.html >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Todd Lipcon >>> Software Engineer, Cloudera >>> >> >
