[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Benoit Sigoure updated HBASE-2323:
----------------------------------

    Description: 
I'm trying to use {{RegexStringComparator}} in conjunction with {{RowFilter}}.  
One of my row keys contained the byte 0xA, which turns out to be the ASCII code 
for the newline character (\n).  When the row key is converted to a string in 
order to use the regexp facility of the Java standard library, it becomes a 
string containing two lines and my regexp does not match.

I believe the solution is to compile the regexp with the {{DOTALL}} flag.  
Luckily, this flag can be "passed" by the client by prefixing the regexp with 
{{(?s)}} so people working with an older version of HBase can work around this 
issue without having to upgrade.


Second problem: One of my row keys contained the sequence {{0x00 0x00 0x9D}} 
({{0x9D}} = -99 when stored in a Java {{byte}}) but in {{compareTo}} the row 
key is transformed in a {{String}} using {{Bytes.toString}}, which just assumes 
that the byte array is an UTF8 encoded string.  Java "cleverly" substituted the 
0x9D byte with 0x63 (character '?').  In my case, I want to use encoding 
ISO-8859-1 as it preserves every byte when the byte array is converted to a 
{{String}} and back to a byte array, unlike UTF-8 or ASCII.  Should we add a 
new method to {{RegexStringComparator}} to allow the user to specify their own 
{{Charset}} instance?

  was:
I'm trying to use {{RegexStringComparator}} in conjunction with {{RowFilter}}.  
One of my row keys contained the byte 0xA, which turns out to be the ASCII code 
for the newline character (\n).  When the row key is converted to a string in 
order to use the regexp facility of the Java standard library, it becomes a 
string containing two lines and my regexp does not match.

I believe the solution is to compile the regexp with the {{DOTALL}} flag.  
Luckily, this flag can be "passed" by the client by prefixing the regexp with 
{{(?s)}} so people working with an older version of HBase can work around this 
issue without having to upgrade.

        Summary: filter.RegexStringComparator does not work with certain bytes  
(was: filter.RegexStringComparator does not work in presence of the byte 0xA)

> filter.RegexStringComparator does not work with certain bytes
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2323
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2323
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: filters
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.3
>            Reporter: Benoit Sigoure
>            Assignee: Benoit Sigoure
>
> I'm trying to use {{RegexStringComparator}} in conjunction with 
> {{RowFilter}}.  One of my row keys contained the byte 0xA, which turns out to 
> be the ASCII code for the newline character (\n).  When the row key is 
> converted to a string in order to use the regexp facility of the Java 
> standard library, it becomes a string containing two lines and my regexp does 
> not match.
> I believe the solution is to compile the regexp with the {{DOTALL}} flag.  
> Luckily, this flag can be "passed" by the client by prefixing the regexp with 
> {{(?s)}} so people working with an older version of HBase can work around 
> this issue without having to upgrade.
> Second problem: One of my row keys contained the sequence {{0x00 0x00 0x9D}} 
> ({{0x9D}} = -99 when stored in a Java {{byte}}) but in {{compareTo}} the row 
> key is transformed in a {{String}} using {{Bytes.toString}}, which just 
> assumes that the byte array is an UTF8 encoded string.  Java "cleverly" 
> substituted the 0x9D byte with 0x63 (character '?').  In my case, I want to 
> use encoding ISO-8859-1 as it preserves every byte when the byte array is 
> converted to a {{String}} and back to a byte array, unlike UTF-8 or ASCII.  
> Should we add a new method to {{RegexStringComparator}} to allow the user to 
> specify their own {{Charset}} instance?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to