[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848478#action_12848478
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on HBASE-2294:
------------------------------------

Yea, the reason I'm voting for C is not for the current model, but rather so we 
can add some more features down the road. The idea of a read-only replica that 
lags the actual region is one (see HBASE-2357). Another is that when a region 
is being loaded after a failure, it could theoretically serve stale data in 
readonly mode from the StoreFiles while it's replaying the log into memstores. 
There are plenty of examples where we may want to time travel (trade off 
uptodate-ness for read availability), and making staleness an option opens us 
up to these possibilities.

> Enumerate ACID properties of HBase in a well defined spec
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-2294
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2294
>             Project: Hadoop HBase
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Todd Lipcon
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 0.20.4, 0.21.0
>
>
> It's not written down anywhere what the guarantees are for each operation in 
> HBase with regard to the various ACID properties. I think the developers know 
> the answers to these questions, but we need a clear spec for people building 
> systems on top of HBase. Here are a few sample questions we should endeavor 
> to answer:
> - For a multicell put within a CF, is the update made durable atomically?
> - For a put across CFs, is the update made durable atomically?
> - Can a read see a row that hasn't been sync()ed to the HLog?
> - What isolation do scanners have? Somewhere between snapshot isolation and 
> no isolation?
> - After a client receives a "success" for a write operation, is that 
> operation guaranteed to be visible to all other clients?
> etc
> I see this JIRA as having several points of discussion:
> - Evaluation of what the current state of affairs is
> - Evaluate whether we currently provide any guarantees that aren't useful to 
> users of the system (perhaps we can drop in exchange for performance)
> - Evaluate whether we are missing any guarantees that would be useful to 
> users of the system

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to