Oh. That's would explain it. :-) On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Jim Kellerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because in memory is not implemented? > > --- > Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Leffel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 7:19 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: In Memory Column Families > > > > Hi all, > > Quick question. I created a new column family (one created > > using IN_MEMORY). > > I expected iterating with a scanner to be much faster, but > > alas, it seems to operate at speeds comparable to regular > > column families. I have verified that in_memory=true on the > > column family. Why isn't this substantially faster? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Danny > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 8.0.135 / Virus Database: 270.4.4/1531 - Release > > Date: 7/2/2008 7:02 PM > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 8.0.135 / Virus Database: 270.4.4/1531 - Release Date: 7/2/2008 > 7:02 PM >
