Thank you!
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael, > > The Namenode is also a SPOF. > > On keeping a separate cluster for failover, until we add higher > availability, it depends on how much uptime you need to provide I guess. I > personally never saw a machine hosting a Master failing, so I'm not sure on > how clean it can be regards the META, but I think that just closing your > region servers, changing the config for the master then restart the cluster > with a new master would be nearly enough provided that the Namenode was > hosted on another machine. Maybe Jim or Stack can confirm? > > J-D
