> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This mailing list doesn't accept attached files... but
> I would love to see those numbers!
Live and learn.
requests: 2907 regions: 9
requests: 7592 regions: 9
requests: 2338 regions: 6
requests: 4869 regions: 9
requests: 5438 regions: 9
requests: 6855 regions: 9
requests: 3284 regions: 9
requests: 6036 regions: 9
requests: 9056 regions: 9
requests: 3767 regions: 9
requests: 9257 regions: 9
requests: 8520 regions: 9
requests: 6954 regions: 8
requests: 7847 regions: 9
requests: 7612 regions: 7
requests: 7774 regions: 6
requests: 7805 regions: 9
requests: 9197 regions: 6
requests: 9663 regions: 7
requests: 6514 regions: 7
requests: 9394 regions: 6
requests: 9588 regions: 8
requests: 9556 regions: 9
Total: servers: 23 requests: 162823 regions: 187
- Andy
> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: load datapoint
> To: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thursday, November 27, 2008, 1:51 PM
> Andrew,
>
> This mailing list doesn't accept attached files... but
> I would love to see those numbers!
>
> J-D
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Andrew Purtell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > We're getting to an interesting load level here
> > now I think. The attached snapshot is typical of some
> > cyclical loads we see. Average load is north of
> > 100K/sec.
> >
> > I'd be curious to hear how this compares with what
> > others are doing.
> >
> > The region count may seem low but we have splitting
> > set at 1G so there is more data there then may seem
> > at first glance.
> >
> > - Andy
