As Jonathan Gray said, it is not on our roadmap currently, so we have not looked at ways to do it. However, JCC is Apache 2.0 license so it is a possible approach.
--- Jim Kellerman, Powerset (Live Search, Microsoft Corporation) > -----Original Message----- > From: Wes Chow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 10:26 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Thrift API vs Java API > > > I stumbled on JCC, the Java->C++ (and Python) bridge that the PyLucene > folk are using: http://svn.osafoundation.org/pylucene/trunk/jcc/jcc/README > > Any thoughts on perhaps using that for the Hadoop family of projects? > > > Wes > > > Jonathan Gray wrote: > > I have not used the thrift interface, but know that many others are. I > > doubt that they are seeing an order of magnitude decrease in > performance. > > What have others seen with thrift? > > > > There are talks of a new client-side API. To my knowledge no one is > working > > on this, so it is not currently scheduled for any upcoming release. > There > > are a number of people who would be interested in it, so please continue > > discussion on the issue if you have an interest in it. > > > > Here is the open issue regarding this (Pure C/C++ client libraries): > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1015 > > > > JG > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Slava Gorelik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 6:12 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Thrift API vs Java API > >> > >> Hi.Currently i'm trying to communicate with Hbase from .NET environment > >> and > >> the only option that i have is Thrift. > >> I did small comparison (execution time) between Java and Thrift (adding > >> 1000 > >> rows with 1k data) and Java is 3.4 ms (average) vs. Thrift that is 44 > >> ms > >> average. > >> It seems that Thrift option is not usable from performance aspect. > >> > >> Now he question : some one tried to implement Hbase client side in C++ > >> / > >> .NET ? Is it feasible ? > >> > >> Best Regards. > >
