Oh really. Em, well I don't know if it's just laziness from them or there really is a stability issue but I think that it's safe for you to migrate, especially since HBase 0.1.2 was stable for your usage!
Good on you Arber, J-D On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Yabo-Arber Xu <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi J-D, > > Thanks for your reply. I got this information from Apache download site, > where only Hadoop 0.17.2 is put under /stable directory. > > Arber > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Arber, > > > > Not sure were you saw that Hadoop 0.18.2 wasn't stable but I currently > work > > for a company where HBase 0.18.1 and that version of Hadoop have been > > deployed for more than 1 month on 17 nodes with more than 1000 regions > and > > we didn't see any issue with stability. > > > > J-D > > > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Yabo-Arber, Xu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > I am trying to upgrade my HBase a new version ( so far i am using > v0.1.2, > > > which is quite stable). Following the wiki pages, it seems the current > > > stable version of HBase is v0.18.1, which works with Hadoop v0.18.x > only, > > > which, however, is a non-stable version. On the other hand, if I > install > > a > > > non-stable HBase v0.2.1, which works with the stable Hadoop v0.17.x. > > > > > > So i am wondering which one is a better configuration here? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Arber > > > > > >
