Maybe it makes sense to make the transport "pluggable". So we can change it without having to modify the code.
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > One reason I'd personally like to see another (binary) wire > protocol for communicating between the clients, master, and > regionservers is HBASE-1015: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1015 > > Maybe I'll have some time to work on this soon in 2009. > > - Andy > > >> From: Michael Dagaev <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: HTable Pooling Results >> To: [email protected] >> Date: Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 1:19 PM >> When I started testing it was pretty obvious that the >> synchronized commit of Htable actually serializes access >> to the table, so pooling was a trivial solution to work >> around the problem. It is good enough, however, I hope >> that the RPC limitation will be fixed. >> >> I believe this is not a big deal from the technical >> perspective but I can understand why it is not trivial. >> It should be fixed by Hadoop. Hadoop do not want to fix >> it, probably. Therefore, Hbase should consider an >> alternative for Hadoop RPC and this is a big deal. >> >> M. > > > > >
