I'm in DC 16th through 25th. Any other days, and either NorCal or
SoCal location is fine with me.

   - Andy

> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: meetup in Jan 2009
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 10:29 AM
> Skype indeed, I don't plan on flying in Cali until April
> unless some angel
> CTO pays for the ride :P
> 
> I also second Stack on Monday or Friday.
> 
> J-D
> 
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 1:19 PM, stack
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I'm good with norcal or socal (as long as socal
> meetup is beside the
> > weekend, Monday or Friday).  IMO, it would be healthy
> having the meetup in a
> > new location.
> >
> > Would be sweet too if wherever we do the meeting, that
> we set up a skype-in
> > for those out in the boondocks -- e.g. Montreal
> (smile) -- like we did at
> > the last HUG meeting except this time we might let
> participants off mute.
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
> >
> >
> > Andrew Purtell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi J-D,
> >>
> >> I think it would be good to have both devs and
> users in
> >> attendance. One possible agenda is to have an
> introduction
> >> of 0.19, followed by user feedback and
> experiences, followed by discussion
> >> and some planning for 0.20.
> >>   - Andy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> From: Jean-Daniel Cryans
> <[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: Re: meetup in Jan 2009
> >>> To: [email protected]
> >>> Date: Saturday, January 3, 2009, 8:14 PM
> >>> Andrew,
> >>>
> >>> Good idea. Do you see the audience of this
> meetup as
> >>> users/devs or only devs?
> >>>
> >>> J-D
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Andrew Purtell
> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Hello all,
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to propose a meetup in
> January 2009,
> >>>> after the 0.19.0 release is cut, to talk
> about
> >>>> what's on the table for 0.20.0.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?pid=12310753&fixfor=12313474&resolution=-1&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC
> >>>
> >>>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >


      

Reply via email to