Want to file an issue Billy? It'd be one thing if we were over-reporting our requests/second. In that case we might be a little slow to the fix but under-reporting, thats a different matter altogether. St.Ack
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Billy Pearson <[email protected]>wrote: > hbase.client.scanner.caching may not be the reasion the request are under > reported. > I set hbase.client.scanner.caching = 1 and still get about 2K request a sec > in the gui > but when the job is done I take records / job time and get 36,324/ records > /sec. So > there must be some cacheing out side of the hbase.client.scanner.caching > makeing the > request per sec lower then it should be. I knwo it running faster then > reported just thought > it might give some new users the wrong impression that request/sec = > read/write /sec. > Billy > > >
