No consideration has been made for changes in how locks are done in new 0.20.0 API. Want to propose something Guilherme? Could new zk-arbitrated locking be done inside the confines of the RowLock object? St.Ack
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Guilherme Germoglio <[email protected]>wrote: > This way, HTable could directly request for read or write row locks ( > http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/current/recipes.html#Shared+Locks) > using zookeeper wrapper. The problem is that the client api would change a > little. Would these changes fit into the client api redesign for 0.20 > (HBASE-1249)? > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Joey Echeverria <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Wouldn't it be better to implement the row locks using zookeeper? > > > > > > > THBase was done before ZK was in the mix. Now its here, we should look > > into > > using it. > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > -- > Guilherme > > msn: [email protected] > homepage: http://germoglio.googlepages.com >
