There is HBASE-1014 filed against 0.20.0. I do not know what its state is, if it'll make it in or not. St.Ack
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 7:43 AM, Bob Schulze <[email protected]> wrote: > Unfortunately, a BatchUpdate object does not get this field updated > upon Htable.commit(), if it was left unset (it remains set to its > default LATEST_TIMESTAMP, on 0.19.1). > > Could that be done? This would allow some use cases that otherwise have > to be implemented using a RowLock. > > Thx, > > Bob >
