stack, please assign *HBASE-1778*<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-1778> to me.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:16 AM, Schubert Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > ok, stack. I will done it as soon as possiable. > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:47 AM, stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can you make an issue and a patch please Schubert? >> St.Ack >> >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Schubert Zhang <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > We found that there are two issues about the PerformanceEvaluation >> class. >> > - Is not match for hadoop-0.20.0. >> > - The approach to split map is not strict. Need to provide correct >> > InputSplit and InputFormat classes. >> > >> > And we have just modified the >> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.PerformanceEvaluation >> > for our evaluations. Please get our code at: >> > >> > http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/24074/code/PerformanceEvaluation.java >> > >> > Here is our evaluations of 0.20.0 RC1 >> > >> http://docloud.blogspot.com/2009/08/hbase-0200-performance-evaluation.html >> > >> > Schubert >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Jeff Hammerbacher <[email protected] >> > >wrote: >> > >> > > Thanks guys. For the lazy (e.g. me) and future searchers, here are >> some >> > > links. The benchmark is meant to simulate the same performance tests >> > quoted >> > > in Google's BigTable paper. >> > > >> > > * PerformanceEvaluation wiki page: >> > > http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hbase/PerformanceEvaluation >> > > * PerformanceEvaluation.java: >> > > >> > > >> > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/hadoop/hbase/trunk/src/test/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/PerformanceEvaluation.java?view=co >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Jeff >> > > >> > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:09 PM, stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher < >> > [email protected] >> > > > >wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hey Stack, >> > > > > >> > > > > I notice that the patch for this issue doesn't include any sort of >> > > tests >> > > > > that might have caught this regression. Do you guys have an >> > HBaseBench, >> > > > > HBaseMix, or similarly named tool for catching performance >> > regressions? >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > Not as part of our build. The way its currently done is that near >> > > release, >> > > > we run our little PerformanceEvaluation doohickey. If its way off, >> > crack >> > > > the profiler. >> > > > >> > > > We have been trying to get some of the hadoop allotment of EC2 time >> so >> > we >> > > > could set up a regular run up on AWS but no luck so far. >> > > > >> > > > Good on your Jeff, >> > > > St.Ack >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Jeff >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 4:51 PM, stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Our writes were off by a factor of 7 or 8. Writes should be >> better >> > > now >> > > > > > (HBASE-1771). >> > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > St.Ack >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:53 PM, stack <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > I just tried it. It seems slow to me writing too. Let me >> take a >> > > > > > look.... >> > > > > > > St.Ack >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, llpind < >> [email protected] >> > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> Okay I changed replication to 2. and removed "-XX:NewSize=6m >> > > > > > >> -XX:MaxNewSize=6m" >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> here is results for randomWrite 3 clients: >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> RandomWrite ================================================= >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> hadoop-0.20.0/bin/hadoop jar >> hbase-0.20.0/hbase-0.20.0-test.jar >> > > > > > >> --nomapred >> > > > > > >> randomWrite 3 >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:51:15 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > Start >> > > > > > >> randomWrite at offset 0 for 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:51:15 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > Start >> > > > > > >> randomWrite at offset 1048576 for 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:51:15 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > Start >> > > > > > >> randomWrite at offset 2097152 for 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:51:47 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > > > >> 0/104857/1048576 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:51:48 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > > > >> 1048576/1153427/2097152 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:51:48 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > > > >> 2097152/2201997/3145728 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:52:22 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > > > >> 1048576/1258284/2097152 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:52:23 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > > > >> 0/209714/1048576 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:52:24 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > > > >> 2097152/2306854/3145728 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:52:47 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > > > >> 1048576/1363141/2097152 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:52:58 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > > > >> 0/314571/1048576 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:52:58 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > > > >> 2097152/2411711/3145728 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:53:24 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > > > >> 1048576/1467998/2097152 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:53:27 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > > > >> 0/419428/1048576 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:53:27 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > > > >> 2097152/2516568/3145728 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:53:48 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > > > >> 1048576/1572855/2097152 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:54:08 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > > > >> 2097152/2621425/3145728 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:54:10 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > > > >> 0/524285/1048576 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:54:40 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > > > >> 1048576/1677712/2097152 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:54:49 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > > > >> 2097152/2726282/3145728 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:54:52 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > > > >> 0/629142/1048576 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:55:57 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > > > >> 1048576/1782569/2097152 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:56:21 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > > > >> 2097152/2831139/3145728 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:56:41 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > > > >> 0/733999/1048576 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:57:23 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > > > >> 1048576/1887426/2097152 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:58:40 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > > > >> 2097152/2935996/3145728 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 09:58:54 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > > > >> 0/838856/1048576 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:00:29 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > > > >> 1048576/1992283/2097152 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:01:01 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > > > >> 2097152/3040853/3145728 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:01:24 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > > > >> 0/943713/1048576 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:02:36 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > > > >> 1048576/2097140/2097152 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:02:37 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-1 >> > > > Finished >> > > > > > >> randomWrite in 680674ms at offset 1048576 for 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:02:37 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: Finished >> 1 >> > in >> > > > > > 680674ms >> > > > > > >> writing 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:03:19 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > > > >> 2097152/3145710/3145728 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:03:20 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-2 >> > > > Finished >> > > > > > >> randomWrite in 723771ms at offset 2097152 for 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:03:20 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: Finished >> 2 >> > in >> > > > > > 723771ms >> > > > > > >> writing 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:03:41 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > > > >> 0/1048570/1048576 >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:03:42 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: client-0 >> > > > Finished >> > > > > > >> randomWrite in 746054ms at offset 0 for 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> 09/08/13 10:03:42 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: Finished >> 0 >> > in >> > > > > > 746054ms >> > > > > > >> writing 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> ============================================================ >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> Still pretty slow. Any other ideas? I'm running the client >> > from >> > > > the >> > > > > > >> master >> > > > > > >> box, but its not running any regionServers or datanodes. >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> stack-3 wrote: >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > Your config. looks fine. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > Only think that gives me pause is: >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > "-XX:NewSize=6m -XX:MaxNewSize=6m" >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > Any reason for the above? >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > If you study your GC logs, lots of pauses? >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > Oh, and this: replication is set to 6. Why 6? Each write >> > must >> > > > > commit >> > > > > > >> to >> > > > > > >> > 6 >> > > > > > >> > datanodes before complete. In the tests posted on wiki, we >> > > > > replicate >> > > > > > to >> > > > > > >> 3 >> > > > > > >> > nodes. >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > In end of this message you say you are doing gets? Numbers >> > you >> > > > > posted >> > > > > > >> > were >> > > > > > >> > for writes? >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > St.Ack >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:15 PM, llpind < >> > [email protected] >> > > > >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> Not sure why my performance is so slow. Here is my >> > > > configuration: >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> box1: >> > > > > > >> >> 10395 SecondaryNameNode >> > > > > > >> >> 11628 Jps >> > > > > > >> >> 10131 NameNode >> > > > > > >> >> 10638 HQuorumPeer >> > > > > > >> >> 10705 HMaster >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> box 2-5: >> > > > > > >> >> 6741 HQuorumPeer >> > > > > > >> >> 6841 HRegionServer >> > > > > > >> >> 7881 Jps >> > > > > > >> >> 6610 DataNode >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> hbase site: ======================= >> > > > > > >> >> <?xml version="1.0"?> >> > > > > > >> >> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" >> href="configuration.xsl"?> >> > > > > > >> >> <!-- >> > > > > > >> >> /** >> > > > > > >> >> * Copyright 2007 The Apache Software Foundation >> > > > > > >> >> * >> > > > > > >> >> * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under >> one >> > > > > > >> >> * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE >> > file >> > > > > > >> >> * distributed with this work for additional information >> > > > > > >> >> * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this >> file >> > > > > > >> >> * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the >> > > > > > >> >> * "License"); you may not use this file except in >> compliance >> > > > > > >> >> * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License >> at >> > > > > > >> >> * >> > > > > > >> >> * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 >> > > > > > >> >> * >> > > > > > >> >> * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in >> writing, >> > > > > > software >> > > > > > >> >> * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS >> IS" >> > > > > BASIS, >> > > > > > >> >> * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either >> > express >> > > > or >> > > > > > >> >> implied. >> > > > > > >> >> * See the License for the specific language governing >> > > > permissions >> > > > > > and >> > > > > > >> >> * limitations under the License. >> > > > > > >> >> */ >> > > > > > >> >> --> >> > > > > > >> >> <configuration> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hbase.rootdir</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>hdfs://box1:9000/hbase</value> >> > > > > > >> >> <description>The directory shared by region servers. >> > > > > > >> >> </description> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hbase.master.port</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>60000</value> >> > > > > > >> >> <description>The port that the HBase master runs at. >> > > > > > >> >> </description> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hbase.cluster.distributed</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>true</value> >> > > > > > >> >> <description>The mode the cluster will be in. Possible >> > > values >> > > > > are >> > > > > > >> >> false: standalone and pseudo-distributed setups with >> > > managed >> > > > > > >> >> Zookeeper >> > > > > > >> >> true: fully-distributed with unmanaged Zookeeper >> Quorum >> > > (see >> > > > > > >> >> hbase-env.sh) >> > > > > > >> >> </description> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hbase.regionserver.lease.period</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>120000</value> >> > > > > > >> >> <description>HRegion server lease period in >> milliseconds. >> > > > > Default >> > > > > > is >> > > > > > >> >> 60 seconds. Clients must report in within this period >> else >> > > > they >> > > > > > are >> > > > > > >> >> considered dead.</description> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hbase.zookeeper.property.clientPort</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>2222</value> >> > > > > > >> >> <description>Property from ZooKeeper's config >> zoo.cfg. >> > > > > > >> >> The port at which the clients will connect. >> > > > > > >> >> </description> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hbase.zookeeper.property.dataDir</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>/home/hadoop/zookeeper</value> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hbase.zookeeper.property.syncLimit</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>5</value> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hbase.zookeeper.property.tickTime</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>2000</value> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hbase.zookeeper.property.initLimit</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>10</value> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hbase.zookeeper.quorum</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>box1,box2,box3,box4</value> >> > > > > > >> >> <description>Comma separated list of servers in the >> > > > ZooKeeper >> > > > > > >> >> Quorum. >> > > > > > >> >> For example, >> > > > > > >> >> "host1.mydomain.com,host2.mydomain.com,host3.mydomain.com >> ". >> > > > > > >> >> By default this is set to localhost for local and >> > > > > > >> pseudo-distributed >> > > > > > >> >> modes >> > > > > > >> >> of operation. For a fully-distributed setup, this >> should >> > > be >> > > > > set >> > > > > > to >> > > > > > >> a >> > > > > > >> >> full >> > > > > > >> >> list of ZooKeeper quorum servers. If HBASE_MANAGES_ZK >> is >> > > set >> > > > > in >> > > > > > >> >> hbase-env.sh >> > > > > > >> >> this is the list of servers which we will start/stop >> > > > ZooKeeper >> > > > > > on. >> > > > > > >> >> </description> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hfile.block.cache.size</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>.5</value> >> > > > > > >> >> <description>text</description> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> </configuration> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> hbase >> > env:==================================================== >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> export HBASE_CLASSPATH=${HADOOP_CONF_DIR} >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> export HBASE_HEAPSIZE=3000 >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> export HBASE_OPTS="-XX:NewSize=6m -XX:MaxNewSize=6m >> > > > > > >> >> -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC >> > > > > > >> >> -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps >> > > > > > >> >> -XX:+CMSIncrementalMode >> > > > > > >> >> -Xloggc:/home/hadoop/hbase-0.20.0/logs/gc-hbase.log" >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> export HBASE_MANAGES_ZK=true >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> Hadoop core >> > > > > > >> >> >> > site=========================================================== >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> <?xml version="1.0"?> >> > > > > > >> >> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" >> href="configuration.xsl"?> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> <!-- Put site-specific property overrides in this file. >> --> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> <configuration> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>fs.default.name</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>hdfs://box1:9000</value> >> > > > > > >> >> <description>The name of the default file system. A URI >> > > whose >> > > > > > >> >> scheme and authority determine the FileSystem >> > implementation. >> > > > > The >> > > > > > >> >> uri's scheme determines the config property >> > (fs.SCHEME.impl) >> > > > > naming >> > > > > > >> >> the FileSystem implementation class. The uri's >> authority >> > is >> > > > used >> > > > > > to >> > > > > > >> >> determine the host, port, etc. for a >> > > filesystem.</description> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> <property> >> > > > > > >> >> <name>hadoop.tmp.dir</name> >> > > > > > >> >> <value>/data/hadoop-0.20.0-${user.name}</value> >> > > > > > >> >> <description>A base for other temporary >> > > > directories.</description> >> > > > > > >> >> </property> >> > > > > > >> >> </configuration> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> ============== >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> replication is set to 6. >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> hadoop env================= >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> export HADOOP_HEAPSIZE=3000 >> > > > > > >> >> export >> HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote >> > > > > > >> >> $HADOOP_NAMENODE_OPTS" >> > > > > > >> >> export >> > > > > HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote >> > > > > > >> >> $HADOOP_SECONDARYNAMENODE_OPTS" >> > > > > > >> >> export >> HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote >> > > > > > >> >> $HADOOP_DATANODE_OPTS" >> > > > > > >> >> export >> HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote >> > > > > > >> >> $HADOOP_BALANCER_OPTS" >> > > > > > >> >> export >> HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS="-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote >> > > > > > >> >> $HADOOP_JOBTRACKER_OPTS" >> > > > > > >> >> ================== >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> Very basic setup. then i start the cluster do simple >> random >> > > Get >> > > > > > >> >> operations >> > > > > > >> >> on a tall table (~60 M rows): >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> {NAME => 'tallTable', FAMILIES => [{NAME => 'family1', >> > > > COMPRESSION >> > > > > => >> > > > > > >> >> 'NONE', VERSIONS => '3', TTL => '2147483647', BLOCKSIZE => >> > > > '65536', >> > > > > > >> >> IN_MEMORY => 'false', BLOCKCACHE => 'true'}]} >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> Is this fairly normal speeds? I'm unsure if this is a >> result >> > > of >> > > > > > having >> > > > > > >> a >> > > > > > >> >> small cluster? Please advise... >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> stack-3 wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > Yeah, seems slow. In old hbase, it could do 5-10k >> writes a >> > > > > second >> > > > > > >> >> going >> > > > > > >> >> > by >> > > > > > >> >> > performance eval page up on wiki. SequentialWrite was >> > about >> > > > same >> > > > > > as >> > > > > > >> >> > RandomWrite. Check out the stats on hw up on that page >> and >> > > > > > >> description >> > > > > > >> >> of >> > > > > > >> >> > how test was set up. Can you figure where its slow? >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > St.Ack >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM, llpind < >> > > > [email protected] >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> >> wrote: >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> Thanks Stack. >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> I will try mapred with more clients. I tried it >> without >> > > > mapred >> > > > > > >> using >> > > > > > >> >> 3 >> > > > > > >> >> >> clients Random Write operations here was the output: >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:22:52 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > Start >> > > > > > >> >> >> randomWrite at offset 0 for 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:22:52 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > Start >> > > > > > >> >> >> randomWrite at offset 1048576 for 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:22:52 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > Start >> > > > > > >> >> >> randomWrite at offset 2097152 for 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:24:23 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 1048576/1153427/2097152 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:24:23 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2097152/2201997/3145728 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:24:25 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 0/104857/1048576 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:27:42 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 0/209714/1048576 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:27:46 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 1048576/1258284/2097152 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:27:46 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2097152/2306854/3145728 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:32:32 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 1048576/1363141/2097152 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:32:33 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 0/314571/1048576 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:32:41 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2097152/2411711/3145728 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:35:31 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 0/419428/1048576 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:35:34 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 1048576/1467998/2097152 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:35:53 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2097152/2516568/3145728 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:39:02 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 0/524285/1048576 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:39:03 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2097152/2621425/3145728 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:40:07 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 1048576/1572855/2097152 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:42:53 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 0/629142/1048576 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:44:25 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2097152/2726282/3145728 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:44:44 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 1048576/1677712/2097152 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:46:43 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 0/733999/1048576 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:48:11 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2097152/2831139/3145728 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:48:29 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 1048576/1782569/2097152 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:50:12 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 0/838856/1048576 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:52:47 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2097152/2935996/3145728 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:53:51 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 1048576/1887426/2097152 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:56:32 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 0/943713/1048576 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:58:32 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2097152/3040853/3145728 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 09:59:14 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 1048576/1992283/2097152 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 10:02:28 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 0/1048570/1048576 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 10:02:30 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-0 >> > > > > > >> Finished >> > > > > > >> >> >> randomWrite in 2376615ms at offset 0 for 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 10:02:30 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > Finished >> > > 0 >> > > > > in >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2376615ms >> > > > > > >> >> >> writing 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 10:06:35 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2097152/3145710/3145728 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 10:06:38 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-2 >> > > > > > >> Finished >> > > > > > >> >> >> randomWrite in 2623395ms at offset 2097152 for 1048576 >> > rows >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 10:06:38 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > Finished >> > > 2 >> > > > > in >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2623395ms >> > > > > > >> >> >> writing 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 10:06:42 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 1048576/2097140/2097152 >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 10:06:43 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > client-1 >> > > > > > >> Finished >> > > > > > >> >> >> randomWrite in 2630199ms at offset 1048576 for 1048576 >> > rows >> > > > > > >> >> >> 09/08/12 10:06:43 INFO hbase.PerformanceEvaluation: >> > Finished >> > > 1 >> > > > > in >> > > > > > >> >> >> 2630199ms >> > > > > > >> >> >> writing 1048576 rows >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> Seems kind of slow for ~3M records. I have a 4 node >> > cluster >> > > > up >> > > > > at >> > > > > > >> the >> > > > > > >> >> >> moment. HMaster & Namenode running on same box. >> > > > > > >> >> >> -- >> > > > > > >> >> >> View this message in context: >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://www.nabble.com/HBase-in-a-real-world-application-tp24920888p24940922.html >> > > > > > >> >> >> Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at >> > Nabble.com. >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> -- >> > > > > > >> >> View this message in context: >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://www.nabble.com/HBase-in-a-real-world-application-tp24920888p24943406.html >> > > > > > >> >> Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> >> >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> -- >> > > > > > >> View this message in context: >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://www.nabble.com/HBase-in-a-real-world-application-tp24920888p24955595.html >> > > > > > >> Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
