Paul:

I can apply the fix from hbase-2037... I can break it out of the posted
patch thats up there.  Just say the word.

St.Ack


On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Ram Kulbak <ram.kul...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> I've encountered the same problem. I think its fixed as part of
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2037
>
> Regards,
> Yoram
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Paul Ambrose <pambr...@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > I ran into some problems with FilterList and SingleColumnValueFilter.
> >
> > I created a FilterList with MUST_PASS_ONE and two
> SingleColumnValueFilters
> > (each testing equality on a different columns) and query some trivial
> data:
> >
> > http://pastie.org/744890
> >
> > The problem that I encountered were two-fold:
> >
> > SingleColumnValueFilter.filterKeyValues() returns ReturnCode.INCLUDE
> > if the column names do not match. If FilterList is employed, then when
> the
> > first Filter returns INCLUDE (because the column names do not match), no
> > more filters for that KeyValue are evaluated.  That is problematic
> because
> > when filterRow() is finally called for those filters, matchedColumn is
> > never
> > found to be true because they were not invoked (due to FilterList exiting
> > from
> > the filterList iteration when the name mismatched INCLUDE was returned).
> > The fix (at least for this scenario) is for
> > SingleColumnValueFilter.filterKeyValues() to
> > return ReturnCode.NEXT_ROW (rather than INCLUDE).
> >
> > The second problem is at the bottom of FilterList.filterKeyValue()
> > where ReturnCode.SKIP is returned if MUST_PASS_ONE is the operator,
> > rather than always returning ReturnCode.INCLUDE and then leaving the
> > final filter decision to be made by the call to filterRow().   I am sure
> > there is a good
> > reason for returning SKIP in other scenarios, but it is problematic in
> > mine.
> >
> > Feedback would be much appreciated.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to