Heh, I like the analogies! :)
Yes, it makes no sense to use HBase for production data volumes, etc., but this 
might be handy for development.
Or for a demo that needs to consists of the same pieces (daemons, configs, 
etc.) on 1 box, so that one can easily move it to a proper, big cluster, 
without re-engineering or replacing any of the components.

For example, you may have an app that you want to demo to a customer, and you 
can't ask them for N boxes for the demo.  But you can ask them for 1 box to 
install something on.

Or maybe you can run everything from a memory stick? ;)  Hey, is there a 
technical reason why having all jars, scripts, configs, etc. on a stick, and 
have the configs point to dirs on the stick for holding data?  I'm not joking, 
really! :)

Thanks,
Otis


----- Original Message ----
> From: Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
> To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, January 15, 2010 4:17:35 PM
> Subject: Re: HBase on 1 box? how big?
> 
> On that scale, why not use MySQL or Postgres?
> 
> "HBase in a box" is like "dynamic equilibrium", or "virtual reality", or
> "jumbo shrimp"... :-)
> 
>   - Andy
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Otis Gospodnetic 
> > To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> > Sent: Fri, January 15, 2010 12:54:42 PM
> > Subject: HBase on 1 box? how big?
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I understand running HBase on a single box is kind of
> > pointless (thanks Andrew Purtell for the reply about numbers of
> > boxes)... but I was wondering what kind of box might one need to
> > host/run various HBase/Hadoop processes?
> > 
> > Imagine I just need to have "HBase in a box", so to speak. :)
> > 
> > I understand it depends on the volume on data, DB structure, request 
> > rates...
> > I don't have those numbers, but say I want HBase to have 100M rows with 
> > data from Apache logs and want to run the common web analytics/stats 
> > reports on a nightly basis.
> > 
> > * Would an EC2 Large Instance suffice?
> > -- Large Instance 7.5 GB of memory, 4 EC2 Compute Units (2 virtual cores
> > with 2 EC2 Compute Units each), 850 GB of local instance storage, 64-bit 
> > platform
> > 
> > * How about EC2 Small Instance?
> > -- Small Instance (Default) 1.7 GB of memory, 1 EC2 Compute Unit (1 virtual 
> core
> > with 1 EC2 Compute Unit), 160 GB of local instance storage, 32-bit platform
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Otis
> > P.S.
> > hw specs from http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/#instance

Reply via email to