Hi guys,

I'm not aware of any support of HBase in Cloudera desktop.  However if
someone wished to add HBase support, I would generally support such a
notion. As engineers used to editing horrific things like build.xml
and using command line tools, we can often underestimate the value of
a good UI.

As for the Java vs Python thing...  Porting to Java seems pointless, I
have some HBase bugs for someone if they have that much spare time :-)

On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Andrew Milkowski
<andrewmilkow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> from my end (although I was able to bring the app with some tweaks) I
> would create proper java-framework for it (currently python), with
> proper configuration files and documentation
>
> However, to me, value of this tool in general is questionable, it is
> much faster to setup a test job shell (or stream job) then to hack
> around with python UI scripts to do the same
>
> Its a nice tool, although somewhat misguided (I think) its like having
> an editor for xml files:)
>
> very best
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 12:51 PM, HadoopNoob <kat.herd...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> I am a grad student at the Univ of Texas – Austin doing some research into
>> Cloudera Desktop. I have very little technical background so I’m trying to
>> find out what actual Hadoop users think.
>>
>> It seems that main benefits of Cloudera Desktop are in convenience (a gui
>> over the regular Hadoop console). If you could redesign it from ground up,
>> what are some major functions that you would like to see a Hadoop management
>> console serve?
>>
>> I know that some of the Cloudera people post here also. Please don't take
>> offense to this - I promise I'm not trying to disparage anyone!
>>
>> Thanks in advance for comments!
>>
>> Jim
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://old.nabble.com/Cloudera-desktop-tp28181265p28181265.html
>> Sent from the HBase User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to