One more request. Please attach the patch to the JIRA HCATALOG-434, not just review board. Review board is a convenience tool. JIRA is the source of record. All patches need to go there.
Alan. On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:25 AM, Travis Crawford wrote: > Sounds good! Rohini/Jakob are y'all okay with this approach? If so, > I'll post a final version of this RB as the first step (current one > has a couple issues, but wanted to post to get the conversation > started). > > The general strategy would be make incremental updates towards the > maven layout, but keep the build working. When we've achieved the > maven layout we could switch to maven/gradle if we still care about > doing that. > > --travis > > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm totally fine with the incremental approach if you feel that's easier >> than a branch. My only requirement is I want to be able to release quickly >> if I need to address bug fixes, etc. >> >> Alan. >> >> On Jun 26, 2012, at 6:36 AM, Travis Crawford wrote: >> >>>> >>> >>> With this in mind - what about the initial approach from the RB, where >>> we do incremental improvements and keep the build functional. I'm >>> hesitant to do this in a branch because of the overhead. >>> >>> Thoughts on the incremental approach? >>> >>> --travis >>> >>> >>
