lgtm.

Alan.

On Sep 6, 2012, at 9:53 AM, Travis Crawford wrote:

> New updated version:
> 
> Changes:
> * List committer count as 9 (was 10)
> * List committer orgs as 3 (was 4)
> 
> 
> """
> HCatalog is a table and storage management service for data created
> using Apache Hadoop. HCatalog entered Apache incubator in March 2011.
> 
> What has the project accomplished since the last report?
> 
> * Released version 0.4
> * Voted in one new committer
> * Received patches from 19 people
> 
> In March 2012, HCatalog was identified as having low diversity. With
> the addition of the new committer there are now 9 committers from 3
> organizations. Additionally, we have received patches from 19 unique
> people (including committers) some of which are outside the committer
> organizations. We believe the low diversity issue has either been
> addressed, or good progress has been made towards addressing the
> issue.
> 
> What are the top 2-3 things to resolve before graduation?
> 
> * Grow the user community. There has been progress in this area with
> new users asking questions on the mailing list, receiving patches from
> an increasing number of contributors, and work towards publishing
> pre-built artifacts in the Apache repository. We need to continue in
> this positive direction.
> * Resolve a review process issue that affects our ability to develop
> new features. Time between receiving patches and committing has
> increased to problematic levels, often causing code rot and
> contributors extra work to rebase patches against trunk.
> 
> At this time we feel confident in our ability to make progress toward
> resolving these issues.
> """
> 
> --travis
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Paul from Facebook hasn't contributed much lately, hence my count of active 
>> committers from three entities.
>> 
>> Alan.
>> 
>> On Sep 6, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Travis Crawford wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> In general looks good.  A few comments inline.
>>>> 
>>>> Alan.
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 5, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Travis Crawford wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hey all -
>>>>> 
>>>>> Here's a starting point for our status update. Please let me know if
>>>>> this looks good, or you'd like to make any edits. Its entirely likely
>>>>> I missed some noteworthy accomplishment or we should highlight
>>>>> different graduation-related issues, so please speak up if you see
>>>>> something I missed!
>>>>> 
>>>>> """
>>>>> HCatalog is a table and storage management service for data created
>>>>> using Apache Hadoop. HCatalog entered Apache incubator in March 2011.
>>>>> 
>>>>> What has the project accomplished since the last report?
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Released version 0.4
>>>>> * Voted in one new committer
>>>>> * Received patches from 19 people
>>>>> 
>>>>> What are the top 2-3 things to resolve before graduation?
>>>>> 
>>>>> * Grow the user and developer communities. There has been progress in
>>>>> this area with new users asking questions on the mailing list,
>>>>> receiving patches from an increasing number of contributors, adding a
>>>>> new committer, and work towards publishing pre-built artifacts in the
>>>>> Apache repository. We need to continue in this positive direction.
>>>> Given that we now have active committers from three distinct commercial 
>>>> entities and patches from 19 different people in the last 3 months the 
>>>> incubator is going to say we've reached a reasonable diversity level for 
>>>> graduation.  So you might change this to say given these things, we 
>>>> believe we've satisfied the diversity requirements.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> SG. I just looked at:
>>> 
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/hcatalog/whoweare.html
>>> 
>>> And I see people listed from HW, Yahoo, Facebook & Twitter. Is that
>>> correct? If so we're actually at 4 entities. I did a quick search for
>>> jira assigned/reported by FB and did not see any, so not sure if we
>>> should list them. Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> --travis
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> * Make HCatalog more robust & featureful. While off to a good start,
>>>>> certain key features are not yet available (such as support for all
>>>>> data types) and Hive dependency issues prevent adding some new
>>>>> features.
>>>> This is irrelevant for graduation, as the incubator is concerned with our 
>>>> community development, not the maturity of our product in a technical 
>>>> sense.  (I'm pretty sure this was on previous reports and I probably even 
>>>> signed those reports, so I see why you put it here.)
>>>> 
>>>>> * Resolve a review process issue that affects our ability to develop
>>>>> new features. Time between receiving patches and committing has
>>>>> increased to problematic levels, often causing code rot and
>>>>> contributors extra work to rebase patches against trunk.
>>>>> 
>>>>> At this time we feel confident in our ability to make progress toward
>>>>> resolving these issues.
>>>>> """
>>>>> 
>>>>> --travis
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Travis Crawford
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Sounds good! I'll read a few past ones and send out a proposed one 
>>>>>> shortly.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --travis
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Alan Gates <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Generally someone volunteers to put it together and circulates it.  
>>>>>>> Then as long as everyone's ok with it we ask one of the mentors to sign 
>>>>>>> off, then post it.  Feel free to take a crack at it and circulate your 
>>>>>>> proposed report.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Alan.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sep 5, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Travis Crawford wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hey all -
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Today's the deadline for this status update. I've never done one of
>>>>>>>> these before so not entirely sure how that works.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Looking at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/hcatalog we see the
>>>>>>>> last report was in March, and there's been some good stuff since then.
>>>>>>>> There's been the release of 0.4, a new committer (me :) and some good
>>>>>>>> user discussions on the mailing list. There's also some issues, such
>>>>>>>> as the review latency issue.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> How does putting this together usually work? Should I look at some
>>>>>>>> past reports and put together what I think makes sense, and send to
>>>>>>>> the list to get some feedback? Hopefully we can do this today so its
>>>>>>>> not late.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --travis
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Marvin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Dear podling,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache 
>>>>>>>>> Incubator PMC.
>>>>>>>>> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your 
>>>>>>>>> quarterly
>>>>>>>>> board report.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 September 2012, 10:00:00 
>>>>>>>>> PST. The report
>>>>>>>>> for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The 
>>>>>>>>> Incubator PMC
>>>>>>>>> requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board 
>>>>>>>>> meeting, to allow
>>>>>>>>> sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Sep 5th).
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator 
>>>>>>>>> PMC, and
>>>>>>>>> subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very 
>>>>>>>>> latest you
>>>>>>>>> should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The Apache Incubator PMC
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Submitting your Report
>>>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Your report should contain the following:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> * Your project name
>>>>>>>>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of 
>>>>>>>>> the project
>>>>>>>>> or necessarily of its field
>>>>>>>>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move 
>>>>>>>>> towards
>>>>>>>>> graduation.
>>>>>>>>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to 
>>>>>>>>> be aware of
>>>>>>>>> * How has the community developed since the last report
>>>>>>>>> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2012
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before 
>>>>>>>>> this page is
>>>>>>>>>   created from a template.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Mentors
>>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off 
>>>>>>>>> on the
>>>>>>>>> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the 
>>>>>>>>> Incubator PMC.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Incubator PMC
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to