>
> On 17 Nov, 2006, at 22:37 , Nathan Kennedy wrote:
>
>> .48 is invalid, .49 is the gateway, .55 is our subnet broadcast
>> address.  so we have only 5 effective IP addresses out of the 8 IP
>> subnet we requested.
>
> FWIW, this is normal - you're not getting screwed over.

I thought so too, I think the tech was just being sloppy when he
included it in the list of "usable IPs."

>> however at any time we can request additional
>> subnets of any size for free, if we use them.  next time we should
>> request at least a 16 iIP subnet.
>
>
> I'd strongly advise doing this now so you don't have to renumber
> later.  It shouldn't be hard to come up with a reasonable and
> truthful justification for an allocation of 14 usable IP addresses.

We can request free additional subnets at any time and keep the old ones.
I don't think it will create problems with our switch to have machines on
different subnets.  We should not have to renumber.  We will need another
subnet as soon as we get another machine besides Abu, because right now
we only have one spare IP after Abu, and when I hook up my laptop that's
the spare.

We will need a chunk for those users who wanted https, and if we decide
to get a Xen VPS server that will be another chunk.  Is there a problem
with Apache serving pages on different subnets?  Can't a machine have
IP addresses on different subnets without creating problems?

> Also, how are you managing reverse DNS?  We at Cernio just worked out
> classless reverse DNS delegation with our colo provider for our /27
> and /26 IP allocations (totaling usable ~90 IPs) - I'd be happy to
> give you our notes on how this was done with BIND9.

We have yet to even set up DNS at Peer1--DNS for these machines is
still being done by fyodor.  Reverse DNS is producing strange results
there so I think it needs to be redelegated.  I saw your messages on
the cernio list about reverse DNS, and our admins might find them and
your notes useful, but it's something that I am not personally going
to be involved with, I hope.

-ntk



_______________________________________________
HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list
[email protected]
http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin

Reply via email to