Davor Ocelic wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:04:05PM -0800, Adam Chlipala wrote: >> I don't think any of the 3 admins have responded yet to my question >> yesterday asking for task information with dependencies. This seems >> like >> a good time to make the policy on e-mail response time official. > > I don't think there's a real need to push this. We're well aware > of the policies. (I though response time was already official?).
I assumed that it wasn't, since, with my interpretation of that policy, all of the admins had violated it w.r.t. my query about tasks & dependencies. Maybe you're reading the policy differently than I am. I mean for the 24 hours to begin when the message is sent, not read. I sent (and received) the message mentioning the lack of replies more than 24 hours after I sent (and received) the previous message in question. Did you feel you were following the policy because you first read the message less than 24 hours before now? It's really impossible to coordinate if we base the policy on times messages are read instead of sent, isn't it? We'd all have to understand each other's sleep and work schedules to be able to predict response times. The option to announce that you are away from e-mail should already provide a way of dealing with situations where there might be a 16-hour period (picking an arbitrary duration here above 8 hours for sleeping but enough below the time limit) where you won't check your e-mail. > 2) Yes, you did not clearly say you wanted the management delegated to > others as well. > > If no one complains, I'm willing to take over all the care of it. I'm sure not complaining. Thanks for volunteering. :-) _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
