My understanding is that is what this command does (or can do).

Peace,

Matt.

From: basile pinsard <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, March 17, 2014 11:22 AM
To: Matt Glasser <[email protected]>
Cc: "Harms, Michael" <[email protected]>, Donna Dierker <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] subdivide parcellation

ok I think I will adapt the MNE code to do the job as I am interested into subdividing the existing parcellation rather than creating a random one.
many thanks for your replies.
cheers

basile


On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Glasser, Matthew <[email protected]> wrote:
They would not necessarily be aligned with the other data either, given that they exist in their own 1mm RAS space, not the 0.7mm RPI spaces released by the HCP.  

For this particular task, I would use:

brainmappers@brainmappers-desktop1:~$ mris_make_face_parcellation 
usage: mris_make_face_parcellation [options] <input surface> <ico file> <output annot>

example: mris_make_face_parcellation lh.surf $FREESURFER_HOME/lib/bem/ic3.tri ./lh.ic3.annot
  surf should be either:
    sphere: units will be approximately equal size within subject but 
            not in correspondence across subjects
    sphere.reg: units will be different sizes within subject but 
            in correspondence across subjects
  Note: do not use inflated as was suggested by previous versions! 
  

This generates a parcellation based on which icosahedral face each vertex maps to.
Options: 
  -ctab colortable.txt

Most FreeSurfer binaries work with GIFTI files now (the .label.gii files are equivalent to annot), but sometimes they have "hidden" inputs that may be hard coded to old formats and directory structures.  If this is the case, they will throw a descriptive error message and you may need to use mris_convert to convert some GIFTI file to be whatever the binary is looking for.  

Peace,

Matt.

From: <Harms>, Michael <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, March 17, 2014 10:04 AM
To: basile pinsard <[email protected]>, Donna Dierker <[email protected]>

Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] subdivide parcellation


I don't think we've had any discussions about releasing the Freesurfer outputs in their "native" FS directory structure.
Indeed, it would be quite redundant to do so.

cheers,
-MH

-- 
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110 Email: [email protected]

From: basile pinsard <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, March 17, 2014 9:51 AM
To: Donna Dierker <[email protected]>
Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] subdivide parcellation

Hi Donna,

so you mean this is the files that will be in the next release?
Because what I get from downloading preprocessed structural does not has this structure, here is a list for one subject:

STRU/101915/T1w/101915_3T.csv
STRU/101915/T1w/aparc.a2009s+aseg.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/aparc+aseg.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/BiasField_acpc_dc.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/brainmask_fs.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.32k_fs_LR.wb.spec
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.L.inflated.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.L.midthickness.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.L.pial.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.L.very_inflated.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.L.white.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.R.inflated.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.R.midthickness.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.R.pial.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.R.very_inflated.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/fsaverage_LR32k/101915.R.white.32k_fs_LR.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/Native
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.L.inflated.native.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.L.midthickness.native.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.L.pial.native.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.L.very_inflated.native.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.L.white.native.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.native.wb.spec
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.R.inflated.native.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.R.midthickness.native.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.R.pial.native.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.R.very_inflated.native.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/Native/101915.R.white.native.surf.gii
STRU/101915/T1w/ribbon.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/T1w_acpc_dc.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/T1w_acpc_dc_restore_brain.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/T1w_acpc_dc_restore.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/T1wDividedByT2w.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/T1wDividedByT2w_ribbon.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/T2w_acpc_dc.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/T2w_acpc_dc_restore_brain.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/T2w_acpc_dc_restore.nii.gz
STRU/101915/T1w/wmparc.nii.gz


Thanks

Basile


On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Donna Dierker <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi basile,

Note that I'm looking at the structure for the data that is about to come out, but I see the Freesurfer original directory structure here:

T1w/106016
T1w/106016/label
T1w/106016/mri
T1w/106016/mri/orig
T1w/106016/mri/transforms
T1w/106016/scripts
T1w/106016/stats
T1w/106016/surf
T1w/106016/touch

Donna


On Mar 15, 2014, at 5:50 PM, basile pinsard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Many thanks for the answers.
>
> @Mark: this seems an interesting option if it enables to overcome the fact that mris_divide_parcellation won't work on gifti and needs freesurfer original subject directory structure. I will need to adapt it to search for the files in hcp structure and handle gifti files though.
>
> @Markus : The only limitation I see for using cmtk Lausanne parcellation on hcp data is the fact it requires regular freesurfer outputs/structure to run it relying on freesurfer binaries. I think they are not contained in the hcp release and this certainly imply converting gitfti back to freesurfer format? Or rerunning sub-optimally freesurfer (without .7mm optimization etc).
>
> Best,
> basile
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Markus Gschwind <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> You might be interested in the parcellation tool form connectomemapper in nipype
> http://nipy.org/nipype/0.6/interfaces/generated/nipype.interfaces.cmtk.parcellation.html
>
> or the connectomemapper itself:
> http://www.cmtk.org/mapper/stages.html#parcellation
>
> This is the tool that created the multi-parcellation presented in
> http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0060159
>
> Best,
> Markus
>
>
> 2014-03-14 20:10 GMT+01:00 basile pinsard <[email protected]>:
> Hi HCP experts,
>
> I am trying to subdivide the aparc.a2009s parcellation (for cortex only, maybe cerebellum too) to get more homogeneous sized parcels (preserving connectivity) to perform connectivity study at the subject level from densetimeseries, I can think of many ways to do this but none is that simple to carry out.
> Is there a command that would be appropriate in wb_command utility?
> What do you think would be the best way to proceed?
> Is it possible to simply map a surface parcellation from fsaverage to a subject's fsaverage32k space?
>
> Thanks
> Best regards.
>
> basile
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> HCP-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> HCP-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>


_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

 


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

 


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.


 


The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to