Hi Yes - "ts2" and "ts3" are different methods for estimated parcel-timeseries (ie node-timeseries) - see the documentation for more details on their differences. Indeed - if they gave the same results (as each other) we would not be distributing both as separate things!
The reason we have used two methods is that they are distinct from each other, but it has not yet been clearly established (in theory or in practice) which is "better" - hence we wanted to release both and give people the chance to choose for themselves and potentially compare both. If you want to just stick with the approach most commonly used in the literature, then just work with ts2 - the "mean-based" timeseries approach. Cheers, Steve. On 19 Oct 2014, at 19:42, 木村一皓 <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm now seeing the netmats (i.e. 3T_Q1-Q6related468_MSMsulc_d300_ts3_netmat1 > 3T_Q1-Q6related468_MSMsulc_d300_ts2_netmat1) from rsfMRI. > Unfortunately, I got the different result from different timeseries. > Which do you recommend should I take? > > Best, > Ikko > > _______________________________________________ > HCP-Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK +44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717) [email protected] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stop the cultural destruction of Tibet _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
