|
Not perfectly. If you wanted to use the individual ones though, you would need to resample the results from the individual ROIs to the atlas ones before comparing. Stam has thought a lot about this, so I would be interested in his opinion.
Thanks,
Matt.
From: Linden Parkes <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 at 12:30 AM To: Matt Glasser <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] MNINonLinear ROIs As a side note. Wouldn't using the Atlas_ variant to generate ROIs for tractography mean that for each participant the ROIs are going to include some of the surrounding white matter?
Does using the xfms transforms account for this?
On 4 November 2014 10:07, Glasser, Matthew
<[email protected]> wrote:
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. _______________________________________________ |
- [HCP-Users] MNINonLinear ROIs Linden Parkes
- Re: [HCP-Users] MNINonLinear ROIs Glasser, Matthew
- Re: [HCP-Users] MNINonLinear ROIs Linden Parkes
- Re: [HCP-Users] MNINonLinear ROIs Glasser, Matthew
- Re: [HCP-Users] MNINonLinear ROIs Linden Parkes
- Re: [HCP-Users] MNINonLinear ROIs Glasser, Matthew
- Re: [HCP-Users] MNINonLinear RO... Linden Parkes
