Hi Joseph, Thanks for your recommendation!
All the best, _______________ Marta Moreno-Ortega, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Research Fellow Division of Experimental Therapeutics New York State Psychiatric Institute Department of Psychiatry Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:41 PM, An Vu <j...@umn.edu> wrote: > Hi Marta, > > Matt has the right idea here. To get the 1.6-2mm at 7T, I would recommend > using IPAT 2, partial fourier 6/8, TE ~20ms. Use the smallest MB factor that > will give you TR <= 1 second (should be MB <= 5). > > Joseph > >> On Feb 23, 2015, at 10:01 AM, hcp-users-requ...@humanconnectome.org wrote: >> >> Send HCP-Users mailing list submissions to >> hcp-users@humanconnectome.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> hcp-users-requ...@humanconnectome.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> hcp-users-ow...@humanconnectome.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of HCP-Users digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. 7 tesla MRI (Marta Moreno) >> 2. Re: 7 tesla MRI (Glasser, Matthew) >> 3. Re: 7 tesla MRI (Marta Moreno) >> 4. Re: Processing Diffusion MRI Data (Archer,Derek B) >> 5. Re: Processing Diffusion MRI Data (Satrajit Ghosh) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 20:26:29 -0500 >> From: Marta Moreno <mmorenoort...@icloud.com> >> Subject: [HCP-Users] 7 tesla MRI >> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >> Message-ID: <68a764ca-d62d-42cf-87ed-c9eb4be92...@icloud.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Hi users, >> >> I am going to start acquiring data from 7 Tesla MRI (Siemens) and would like >> to know best option for resting state (carrying out whole brain shimming up >> to 2nd order). Which would be best protocol in your expert opinion? >> >> Thanks! >> _______________ >> Marta Moreno-Ortega, Ph.D. >> Postdoctoral Research Fellow >> Division of Experimental Therapeutics >> New York State Psychiatric Institute >> Department of Psychiatry >> Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons >> >> >> >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/pipermail/hcp-users/attachments/20150222/66144559/attachment-0001.html >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 01:37:22 +0000 >> From: "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> >> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] 7 tesla MRI >> To: Marta Moreno <mmorenoort...@icloud.com>, >> "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >> Message-ID: <d10fe02a.e8a88%glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/pipermail/hcp-users/attachments/20150223/7d35a7c7/attachment-0001.html >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:35:37 -0500 >> From: Marta Moreno <mmorenoort...@icloud.com> >> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] 7 tesla MRI >> To: "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> >> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >> Message-ID: <0b4de77d-556c-4ca4-99c1-50f830a4a...@icloud.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" >> >> Thank you very much, Matt! I am going to test both this week and chose best. >> Is there any other information I should be aware of in order to acquire my >> data best way and establish a final protocol? Will have this week for >> testing. >> _______________ >> Marta Moreno-Ortega, Ph.D. >> Postdoctoral Research Fellow >> Division of Experimental Therapeutics >> New York State Psychiatric Institute >> Department of Psychiatry >> Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons >> >> >> >> >> On Feb 22, 2015, at 8:37 PM, "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> I?d get the best spatial resolution you can (e.g. 2mm-1.6mm) while keeping >>> the TR under 1 second (with multi-band EPI). >>> >>> Peace, >>> >>> Matt. >>> >>> From: Marta Moreno <mmorenoort...@icloud.com> >>> Date: Sunday, February 22, 2015 at 7:26 PM >>> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >>> Subject: [HCP-Users] 7 tesla MRI >>> >>> Hi users, >>> >>> I am going to start acquiring data from 7 Tesla MRI (Siemens) and would >>> like to know best option for resting state (carrying out whole brain >>> shimming up to 2nd order). Which would be best protocol in your expert >>> opinion? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> _______________ >>> Marta Moreno-Ortega, Ph.D. >>> Postdoctoral Research Fellow >>> Division of Experimental Therapeutics >>> New York State Psychiatric Institute >>> Department of Psychiatry >>> Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HCP-Users mailing list >>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org >>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >>> >>> >>> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >>> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you >>> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, >>> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents >>> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email >>> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. >> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/pipermail/hcp-users/attachments/20150222/c70fc018/attachment-0001.html >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:02:47 +0000 >> From: "Archer,Derek B" <arche...@ad.ufl.edu> >> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >> To: "Glasser, Matthew" <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu>, Stamatios >> Sotiropoulos <stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk>, >> "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >> Message-ID: >> <ff208477c5853f498cf288adb02491a34d9b3...@ufexch-mbxn03.ad.ufl.edu> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> Is it possible to use nipype for bedpost processing? Will this allow me to >> use the grad_dev.nii.gz file? >> >> I haven't seen any other people using bedpost via nipype within this forum, >> however, it is being recommended to use by the engineer working for the >> cluster. >> >> Thanks, >> Derek >> >> From: Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu] >> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:55 PM >> To: Archer,Derek B; Stamatios Sotiropoulos; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org >> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >> >> Are you running the command on ${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/T1w/Diffusion ? >> >> You'll need the latest version of FSL 5.0.8 on your cluster as well. >> >> Peace, >> >> Matt. >> >> From: <Archer>, Derek B <arche...@ad.ufl.edu<mailto:arche...@ad.ufl.edu>> >> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 11:53 AM >> To: Matt Glasser <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu<mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu>>, >> Stamatios Sotiropoulos >> <stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk<mailto:stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk>>, >> "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" >> <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>> >> Subject: RE: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> The exact command I'm using locally is (I tried this from Stam's input): >> >> bedpostx <subject directory> -n 3 -model 2 -g -rician >> >> Subject directory contents: >> bvals >> bvecs >> data.nii.gz >> nodif_brain_mask.nii.gz >> grad_dev.nii.gz >> >> This works. How long do you estimate this will take? Because the -g option >> is not available on the cluster I am working on (not sure why this is the >> case..), and I think that may be causing the issue. >> >> Thanks, >> Derek >> From: Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu] >> Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:47 PM >> To: Archer,Derek B; Stamatios Sotiropoulos; >> hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >> >> How about posting the exact command line you are using and a listing of the >> contents of <subject_directory> >> >> Peace, >> >> Matt. >> >> From: <Archer>, Derek B <arche...@ad.ufl.edu<mailto:arche...@ad.ufl.edu>> >> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 9:20 AM >> To: Stamatios Sotiropoulos >> <stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk<mailto:stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk>>, >> "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" >> <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>> >> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >> >> >> Hi Matt and Stam, >> >> I seem to still be having some sort of issue running bedpostx. I'm using: >> >> bedpostx <subject_directory> --cnonlinear --rician --model=2 --nf=3. >> >> (The -g option is not available in my version of FSL (5.0.5). I am on a >> cluster environment.) >> >> So when I run this line of code, I get the following error: >> ** ERROR: nifti_convert_nhdr2nim: bad dim[0] >> ** ERROR: (nifti_image_read): cannot create nifty image from header 'data' >> ** ERROR: nifti_image_open (data): bad header info >> ** ERROR: failed to open file data >> >> The error seems to be with data.nii.gz, but is there error actually >> occurring because I am not feeding in grad_dev.nii.gz via the -g option? Do >> I need a newer version of FSL? >> >> Thanks, >> Derek Archer >> >> From: Stamatios Sotiropoulos [mailto:stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk] >> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 12:48 PM >> To: Archer,Derek B >> Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >> >> Hi Derek >> >> Please notice that model=3 is not officially released yet in FSL. Also, >> there should be a future HCP release in the near future including bedpostx >> results, with the optimal parameters. >> >> Stam >> >> >> >> On 16 Feb 2015, at 16:25, Archer,Derek B >> <arche...@ad.ufl.edu<mailto:arche...@ad.ufl.edu>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Matt, >> >> Thanks for the fast reply. I will use these three inputs in bedpostX. >> >> Derek >> >> From: Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu] >> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 11:24 AM >> To: Archer,Derek B; >> hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >> >> Why do you need to use FLIRT/FNIRT with already registered data? As for the >> others and aside from the flags you already mention, I think the >> recommendation for bedpostX will include these flags: >> >> -n 3 (for 3 fibers) >> --cnonlinear >> --rician >> --model=3 >> >> Not all of this may yet be available in the public release (you might need >> to use --model=2 for now). >> >> Peace, >> >> Matt. >> >> From: <Archer>, Derek B <arche...@ad.ufl.edu<mailto:arche...@ad.ufl.edu>> >> Date: Monday, February 16, 2015 at 9:16 AM >> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" >> <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>> >> Subject: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >> >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to analyze the preprocessed diffusion data, however, I am having >> some difficulties. Is there some documentation that I could look at that >> outlines how to use bedpostx, FLIRT/FNIRT, DTIFIT and probtrackx with this >> data? >> >>> From what I've found in the archives, I need to do the following: >> >> Bedpostx: include the -g option >> FLIRT/FNIRT: do I include any extra options here? >> DTIFIT: include the -gradnonlin option >> >> Is this all that needs to be done to have this data ready for tractography? >> Or are there steps that I have missed? >> >> Please let me know if there is any documentation I have failed to locate. >> >> Thanks, >> Derek Archer >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HCP-Users mailing list >> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org> >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >> >> ________________________________ >> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you >> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, >> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents >> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email >> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HCP-Users mailing list >> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org> >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HCP-Users mailing list >> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org> >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >> >> ________________________________ >> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you >> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, >> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents >> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email >> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. >> >> ________________________________ >> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you >> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, >> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents >> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email >> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/pipermail/hcp-users/attachments/20150223/d981a45d/attachment-0001.html >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:01:37 -0500 >> From: Satrajit Ghosh <sa...@mit.edu> >> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >> Message-ID: >> <ca+a4wonsfg0qpfqcgco6qdjxnuautdfruzwny9q2nsnljog...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> hi derek, >> >> i would recommend at this point to use the HCP pipelines. however, if you >> are comfortable hacking the code, the bedpostx step itself can be replaced >> by a corresponding call to a nipype workflow, or better still if you have a >> GPU to use the nipype bedpostx GPU interface. >> >> for standard bedpostx nipype simply parallelizes the operation across >> slices, but is able to do so on any cluster environment >> (SGE/LSF/PBS/SLURM). thus, you simply reduce the time by assigning a slice >> to a core. how much you can parallelize depends on our cluster >> configuration. while we haven't done this yet, the nipype bedpostx workflow >> could easily be made to look exactly like the command line call, to be a >> drop in replacement. >> >> however, if you have an Nvidia GPU (such as a tesla or equivalent), you can >> drastically reduce the compute time. for our standard sequences (about 70 >> directions, 60 slices), we can run bedpostx for a given participant on the >> gpu in less than 10 minutes. >> >> cheers, >> >> satra >> >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Archer,Derek B <arche...@ad.ufl.edu> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Matt, >>> >>> >>> >>> Is it possible to use nipype for bedpost processing? Will this allow me >>> to use the grad_dev.nii.gz file? >>> >>> >>> >>> I haven?t seen any other people using bedpost via nipype within this >>> forum, however, it is being recommended to use by the engineer working for >>> the cluster. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Derek >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu] >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:55 PM >>> >>> *To:* Archer,Derek B; Stamatios Sotiropoulos; >>> hcp-users@humanconnectome.org >>> *Subject:* Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >>> >>> >>> >>> Are you running the command on ${StudyFolder}/${Subject}/T1w/Diffusion ? >>> >>> >>> >>> You?ll need the latest version of FSL 5.0.8 on your cluster as well. >>> >>> >>> >>> Peace, >>> >>> >>> >>> Matt. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *<Archer>, Derek B <arche...@ad.ufl.edu> >>> *Date: *Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 11:53 AM >>> *To: *Matt Glasser <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu>, Stamatios Sotiropoulos < >>> stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk>, "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" < >>> hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >>> *Subject: *RE: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Matt, >>> >>> >>> >>> The exact command I?m using locally is (I tried this from Stam?s input): >>> >>> >>> >>> bedpostx <subject directory> ?n 3 ?model 2 ?g ?rician >>> >>> >>> >>> Subject directory contents: >>> >>> bvals >>> >>> bvecs >>> >>> data.nii.gz >>> >>> nodif_brain_mask.nii.gz >>> >>> grad_dev.nii.gz >>> >>> >>> >>> This works. How long do you estimate this will take? Because the ?g >>> option is not available on the cluster I am working on (not sure why this >>> is the case..), and I think that may be causing the issue. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Derek >>> >>> *From:* Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu >>> <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu>] >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 17, 2015 12:47 PM >>> *To:* Archer,Derek B; Stamatios Sotiropoulos; >>> hcp-users@humanconnectome.org >>> *Subject:* Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >>> >>> >>> >>> How about posting the exact command line you are using and a listing of >>> the contents of <subject_directory> >>> >>> >>> >>> Peace, >>> >>> >>> >>> Matt. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *<Archer>, Derek B <arche...@ad.ufl.edu> >>> *Date: *Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 9:20 AM >>> *To: *Stamatios Sotiropoulos <stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk>, " >>> hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >>> *Subject: *Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Matt and Stam, >>> >>> >>> >>> I seem to still be having some sort of issue running bedpostx. I?m using: >>> >>> >>> >>> bedpostx <subject_directory> --cnonlinear --rician --model=2 --nf=3. >>> >>> >>> >>> (The ?g option is not available in my version of FSL (5.0.5). I am on a >>> cluster environment.) >>> >>> >>> >>> So when I run this line of code, I get the following error: >>> >>> ** ERROR: nifti_convert_nhdr2nim: bad dim[0] >>> >>> ** ERROR: (nifti_image_read): cannot create nifty image from header ?data? >>> >>> ** ERROR: nifti_image_open (data): bad header info >>> >>> ** ERROR: failed to open file data >>> >>> >>> >>> The error seems to be with data.nii.gz, but is there error actually >>> occurring because I am not feeding in grad_dev.nii.gz via the ?g option? Do >>> I need a newer version of FSL? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Derek Archer >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Stamatios Sotiropoulos [ >>> mailto:stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk >>> <stamatios.sotiropou...@ndcn.ox.ac.uk>] >>> *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2015 12:48 PM >>> *To:* Archer,Derek B >>> *Cc:* hcp-users@humanconnectome.org >>> *Subject:* Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Derek >>> >>> >>> >>> Please notice that model=3 is not officially released yet in FSL. Also, >>> there should be a future HCP release in the near future including bedpostx >>> results, with the optimal parameters. >>> >>> >>> >>> Stam >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 16 Feb 2015, at 16:25, Archer,Derek B <arche...@ad.ufl.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Matt, >>> >>> >>> Thanks for the fast reply. I will use these three inputs in bedpostX. >>> >>> >>> >>> Derek >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Glasser, Matthew [mailto:glass...@wusm.wustl.edu >>> <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu>] >>> *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2015 11:24 AM >>> *To:* Archer,Derek B; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org >>> *Subject:* Re: [HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >>> >>> >>> >>> Why do you need to use FLIRT/FNIRT with already registered data? As for >>> the others and aside from the flags you already mention, I think the >>> recommendation for bedpostX will include these flags: >>> >>> >>> >>> -n 3 (for 3 fibers) >>> >>> --cnonlinear >>> >>> --rician >>> >>> --model=3 >>> >>> >>> >>> Not all of this may yet be available in the public release (you might need >>> to use --model=2 for now). >>> >>> >>> >>> Peace, >>> >>> >>> >>> Matt. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From: *<Archer>, Derek B <arche...@ad.ufl.edu> >>> *Date: *Monday, February 16, 2015 at 9:16 AM >>> *To: *"hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> >>> *Subject: *[HCP-Users] Processing Diffusion MRI Data >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am trying to analyze the preprocessed diffusion data, however, I am >>> having some difficulties. Is there some documentation that I could look at >>> that outlines how to use bedpostx, FLIRT/FNIRT, DTIFIT and probtrackx with >>> this data? >>> >>> >>> >>> From what I?ve found in the archives, I need to do the following: >>> >>> >>> >>> Bedpostx: include the ?g option >>> >>> FLIRT/FNIRT: do I include any extra options here? >>> >>> DTIFIT: include the ?gradnonlin option >>> >>> >>> >>> Is this all that needs to be done to have this data ready for >>> tractography? Or are there steps that I have missed? >>> >>> >>> >>> Please let me know if there is any documentation I have failed to locate. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Derek Archer >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HCP-Users mailing list >>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org >>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >>> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you >>> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, >>> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents >>> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email >>> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HCP-Users mailing list >>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org >>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HCP-Users mailing list >>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org >>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >>> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you >>> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, >>> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents >>> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email >>> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected >>> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you >>> are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, >>> disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents >>> of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email >>> in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HCP-Users mailing list >>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org >>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/pipermail/hcp-users/attachments/20150223/c340c3f4/attachment.html >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HCP-Users mailing list >> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >> >> >> End of HCP-Users Digest, Vol 27, Issue 34 >> ***************************************** > > > _______________________________________________ > HCP-Users mailing list > HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org > http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
