Matt,

Want to keep 1.6. 
I am doing IPAT=2
Just for resting state, not tasks, for 20 min.

Your recommendation would be MB5 with TR=962 better than MB4 with TR=1090?

Fieldmap 1.6*1.6*2 is not working well enough. How did you acquire your 
Fieldmap? Any suggestion for improvement (see attachment if needed)?

Finally, will be an available HCP pipeline online for 7 tesla sometime soon? I 
am using SPM now.

Thank you very much for this communication!!

Best wishes always,

Leah

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 6:53 AM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wusm.wustl.edu> wrote:
> 
> We used ipat=2 MB=5 for 1.6mm isotropic data with TR=1s (for reasons of 
> improving temporal cleanup, I might be inclined to do 2mm and shorten the TR 
> further like the 3T HCP data, but there are still active investigations into 
> whether the 1.6mm data allow us to see finer details).  The main trick with 
> the 7T HCP data is that we are using the 3T structural scans (T1w and T2w at 
> 0.7mm).  The 3D T2w SPACE is hard to get at 7T because of SAR issues, and T1w 
> MPRAGEs are much more inhomgeneous in their flip angles than at 3T, though 
> hopefully it will be more possible when parallel transmit becomes more 
> standard.  
> 
> The grayordinatewise CNR is dramatically higher in the 7T HCP data, however.  
> 
> Peace,
> 
> Matt.
> 
> From: Marta Moreno <mmorenoort...@icloud.com>
> Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 at 3:52 AM
> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: [HCP-Users] rsfMRI at 7 Tesla
> 
> Hi users,
> 
> I am studying preliminary data in order to define my protocol at 7 Tesla 
> following some comments I posted here some time ago. I am testing rsfMRI 
> 1.6x1.6x1.6:
> 1. MB5 TR=962 vs MB4 TR=1090
> 2. B0Fieldmap vs Topups
> High order and degree shimming (1st and 2nd), 24channel coil. 
> My conclusion is MB4 TR=1090 and Topups.
> 
> Will test tomorrow high order and degree shimming (3rd and 4th degree), 
> quadrature. 
> 
> Wanted to here some expert opinions… I would like to acquire data to be 
> processed through the HCP whenever it is possible.
> I attached very preliminary protocol just in case you can take a look and 
> give me some feedback.
> 
> Thank you very much for your help in advance,
> 
> Leah
> 
> _______________________________________________
> HCP-Users mailing list
> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
> 
> _______________
> Marta Moreno-Ortega, Ph.D.
> Postdoctoral Research Fellow
> Division of Experimental Therapeutics
> New York State Psychiatric Institute
> Department of Psychiatry
> Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected 
> Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are 
> not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, 
> copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this 
> information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, 
> please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to