The AR(1) correction is a scaling applied during the r-to-z transformation
This is from nets_netmats.m
RtoZcorrection=1/std(grotZ);
netmats=0.5*log((1+netmats)./(1-netmats))*RtoZcorrection;
So, if you knew the value of RtoZcorrection you could convert the HCP distributed netmats back to r-value. BUT, that value wasn't saved.
If you want the netmats expressed as correlations (r-values) why not just run:
ts_dir='PATH_TO_TIMESERIES';
nRuns = 4;
ts = nets_load(ts_dir,0.72,1,nRuns);
netmat1 = nets_netmats(ts,0,'corr'); %% Second argument 0, to leave netmats as r
It takes a little bit of time, but not *that* much, and you only need to do it once. If I recall correctly, when I did it on the full set of time-series from the HCP 500 release, it took something like an hour or two total for the nets_load and nets_netmats
steps.
cheers,
-MH
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave.
Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110
Email: mha...@wustl.edu
From: Yizhou Ma <maxxx...@umn.edu>
Date: Monday, March 30, 2015 6:54 PM To: "Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu> Cc: Stephen Smith <st...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk>, "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in HCP Dear Dr. Harms,
Thank you very much for your codes. They are very helpful for me to understand how FSLNets works. I am able to reproduce individual netmats that are perfectly correlated with HCP distributed netmats.
I also tried the mean netmat of full correlations netmats from the 4 runs. They also give me netmats that are perfectly correlated with HCP distributed netmats (by perfectly correlated I mean Pearson's correlation=1.0000 in matlab). Thus the AR(1) process
does not seem to affect the result very much.
Since I still do not understand the scaling of the z values in HCP distributed netmats, may I know how I can transform them back to r values, so that to get an idea of the size of correlation? (to run nets_netmats with z=0 (leave netmats as r)) is too
time consuming for this purpose).
Thanks,
Cherry
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:34 PM, Harms, Michael
<mha...@wustl.edu> wrote:
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. _______________________________________________ |
- [HCP-Users] netmats in HCP Yizhou Ma
- Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in HCP Timothy Coalson
- Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in HCP Yizhou Ma
- Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in HCP Stephen Smith
- Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in HCP Glasser, Matthew
- Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in HCP Stephen Smith
- Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in HCP Yizhou Ma
- Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in ... Harms, Michael
- Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in ... Yizhou Ma
- Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in ... Harms, Michael
- Re: [HCP-Users] netmats in ... Yizhou Ma