Hi Donna,

Thanks for the info – I keep learning new functionality in wb_command! :-)
However, when I run that on the CIFTI connectivity file I don’t get such 
results (see below).
Are there some hidden switches to get such an output? Or maybe those metrics 
are only given for functional data?
FYI, I’m using wb_command v1.1.1 on Linux.

Cheers,

M@

$ wb_command -file-information Conn3.dconn.nii
Name:                           Conn3.dconn.nii
Type:                           Connectivity - Dense
Structure:                      CortexLeft CortexRight
Data Size:                      33.33 Gigabytes
Maps to Surface:                true
Maps to Volume:                 true
Maps with LabelTable:           false
Maps with Palette:              true
All Map Palettes Equal:         true
Map Interval Units:             NIFTI_UNITS_UNKNOWN
Number of Rows:                 91282
Number of Columns:              91282
Volume Dim[0]:                  91
Volume Dim[1]:                  109
Volume Dim[2]:                  91
Palette Type:                   File (One for all maps)
CIFTI Dim[0]:                   91282
CIFTI Dim[1]:                   91282
ALONG_ROW map type:             BRAIN_MODELS
    Has Volume Data:            true
    Volume Dims:                91,109,91
    Volume Space:               -2,0,0,90;0,2,0,-126;0,0,2,-72
    CortexLeft:                 29696 out of 32492 vertices
    CortexRight:                29716 out of 32492 vertices
    AccumbensLeft:              135 voxels
    AccumbensRight:             140 voxels
    AmygdalaLeft:               315 voxels
    AmygdalaRight:              332 voxels
    BrainStem:                  3472 voxels
    CaudateLeft:                728 voxels
    CaudateRight:               755 voxels
    CerebellumLeft:             8709 voxels
    CerebellumRight:            9144 voxels
    DiencephalonVentralLeft:    706 voxels
    DiencephalonVentralRight:   712 voxels
    HippocampusLeft:            764 voxels
    HippocampusRight:           795 voxels
    PallidumLeft:               297 voxels
    PallidumRight:              260 voxels
    PutamenLeft:                1060 voxels
    PutamenRight:               1010 voxels
    ThalamusLeft:               1288 voxels
    ThalamusRight:              1248 voxels
ALONG_COLUMN map type:          BRAIN_MODELS
    Has Volume Data:            true
    Volume Dims:                91,109,91
    Volume Space:               -2,0,0,90;0,2,0,-126;0,0,2,-72
    CortexLeft:                 29696 out of 32492 vertices
    CortexRight:                29716 out of 32492 vertices
    AccumbensLeft:              135 voxels
    AccumbensRight:             140 voxels
    AmygdalaLeft:               315 voxels
    AmygdalaRight:              332 voxels
    BrainStem:                  3472 voxels
    CaudateLeft:                728 voxels
    CaudateRight:               755 voxels
    CerebellumLeft:             8709 voxels
    CerebellumRight:            9144 voxels
    DiencephalonVentralLeft:    706 voxels
    DiencephalonVentralRight:   712 voxels
    HippocampusLeft:            764 voxels
    HippocampusRight:           795 voxels
    PallidumLeft:               297 voxels
    PallidumRight:              260 voxels
    PutamenLeft:                1060 voxels
    PutamenRight:               1010 voxels
    ThalamusLeft:               1288 voxels
    ThalamusRight:              1248 voxels




On 25/8/15 15:48 , "Donna Dierker" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

wb_command -file-information gives you stats like this:

Map     Minimum     Maximum     Mean   Sample Dev   % Positive   %Negative   
Inf/NaN   Map Name


On Aug 25, 2015, at 6:32 AM, Matthew George Liptrot 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Stam,
Yep, workbench opens them fine. If I load in the dconn file, a surface and the 
greyordinates.dscalar file, then I can see the connectivity maps as I click 
different parts of the surface.
Is there a better way to check if the values are reasonable? E.g. Would the 
histograms report if NaNs are present?
Good to hear about the FSL release! I guess though that this is a wb_command 
bug (or a bug in my use of it! :-)
Cheers,
M@
On 24/8/15 14:40 , "Stamatios Sotiropoulos" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 wrote:
Hi Matthew
No, they are not meant to be there. Can you open and display the dconn file in 
workbench?
FYI, there will be a new FSL release sometime this or the next week. It will 
have some bug fixes in probtrackx2 and some new features. It may be the case 
that this problem disappears with the new version.
Cheers
Stam
On 24 Aug 2015, at 08:24, Matthew George Liptrot 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all,
We’ve been using the HCP DWI data to generate dense connectomes in ‘matrix3’ 
format. Following previous advice, we are doing this in multiple stages:
• Generate 3 separate targets (left surface, right surface, subcortical voxels)
• For each, run probtrackx2 (seed = white matter voxels, target as above) 
multiple times using the ‘-rseed’ option (1000 streams per voxel as a 
robustness / computational trade-off).
• The multiple probtrackx2 runs are combined with FSL’s fdt_matrix_merge. This 
gives us 3 FSL  .dot files.
• Convert each of the three .dot files to .dconn using <wb_command 
-probtrackx-dot-convert>
• Merge the three .dconn files using <wb_command  -cifti-merge-dense> to obtain 
the final 92K x 92K dconn matrix.
The problem is that we get both NaN’s and zeros in the final, merged dconn 
matrix. Presumably we should not have any NaN’s, as the numbers should just 
represent count statistics?
We looked into the outputs at different stages, and it seems that the NaN’s 
only appear after Step 5.
So our question is: are the NaN’s meant to be there, and if so, what do they 
represent? If not, is this a bug or a mistake on our part?
Many thanks for any help!
M@
--
Matthew George Liptrot
Department of Computer Science
University of Copenhagen
&
Section for Cognitive Systems
Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Technical University of Denmark
http://about.me/matthewliptrot
_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users





<http://about.me/matthewliptrot>


--
Matthew George Liptrot

<http://about.me/matthewliptrot>
Department of Computer Science
University of Copenhagen
&
Section for Cognitive Systems
Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science
Technical University of Denmark

http://about.me/matthewliptrot


_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to