Dear experts, I would like to double check the concept of morphological connectivity as introduced e.g. by Sanabria-Diaz et al, NeuroImage 2010 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.028 <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.028>
As I understand this concept, the morphological connectivity matrix is constructed across subjects (Regions x Subjects), using metrices like region-wise cortical thickness (or surface area or curvature etc.). The result is then the covariation across all subjects, right? On the contrary it would not make sense to construct a Region x Region matrix per subject, would it? And would it make sense at all to use the pure voxelwise T1 values (summed up within the AAL region) as the correlation metric? The reason of my questions is that exactly this is done in a manuscript, which I accepted to review, however it is very poorly referenced and I cannot find any literature doing exactly this. Many thanks in advance! Best regards, Markus _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
