|
Maybe Steve or MJ can chime in regarding the FSL issues, but I do recall there being some concern years ago whether ‘FSL’ was fully compliant with UINT16 NIFTI’s.
Regardless, in terms of what we are currently using, it is FLOAT32.
--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave.
Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO 63110
Email: [email protected]
From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Timothy Coalson <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 3:14 PM To: "Garrett T. McGrath" <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Negative Voxel Values signed int 16 vs uint16 issue NiFTI-1.1 does in fact support both signed and unsigned int16:
... #define DT_UINT16 512 /* unsigned short (16 bits) */ I don't know if this was the case in NiFTI-1.0, but NiFTI-1.1 has been around so long it would be strange if tools didn't support it, but did support 1.0. If dcm2nii or MRICron is treating them incorrectly, then you should contact the tool's authors.
MRICron isn't reading it as analyze format, is it? The old analyze format doesn't support uint16.
I don't know whether topup cares what the input datatype is. float32 can exactly represent any value of int16 or uint16, so it seems unlikely that conversion to float32 would cause problems (unless the data scaling and offset do something unusual...).
Tim
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Garrett T. McGrath
<[email protected]> wrote:
We've had a set of users that have discovered an issue with their latest datasets that I'm hoping there might be a best practice for dealing with in regards to FSL. _______________________________________________ The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. _______________________________________________ |
- [HCP-Users] Negative Voxel Values signed int 16 vs uint... Garrett T. McGrath
- Re: [HCP-Users] Negative Voxel Values signed int 1... Timothy Coalson
- Re: [HCP-Users] Negative Voxel Values signed i... Harms, Michael
- Re: [HCP-Users] Negative Voxel Values sign... Stephen Smith
- Re: [HCP-Users] Negative Voxel Values signed int 1... Harms, Michael
