No, that’s sufficient. Thanks very much for your help, Giles
> On 1 Apr 2016, at 14:28, Francesco Di Pompeo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Giles, > > the reason is that some of the preprocessing Quality Check (QC) scores are > not good for one or more resting state sessions. > May be something went wrong during the acquisition or the subject was not > actually at rest. > > Unfortunately, as far as I know, the QC scores are not available to the users > and hence you cannot figure out what is the problem affecting a given subject. > > If you would like to know the reason why some subjects have been discarded > send me a list and I can check them for you. > > Let me know if you have any further comment or question. > > Best, > Francesco > > > On Mar 30, 2016, at 7:54 PM, Giles Colclough wrote: > >> Can anyone point me to why certain subjects have not provided some >> resting-state data? >> For example, in the MEG2 release, 6 subjects don’t provide rMEG. I’ve >> hunted, but can’t find out why. >> >> Thanks for any suggestions. >> >> Giles >> _______________________________________________ >> HCP-Users mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users > > Francesco Di Pompeo, PhD > Institute of Advanced Biomedical Technologies and > Department of Neuroscience and Imaging > University of Chieti "G. d'Annunzio" > Via dei Vestini - Campus Universitario > 66013 Chieti - ITALY > ph: +39-0871-3556907 > fax:+39-0871-3556930 > > > _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
