My experience with the phyiso files is that in a basic PNM model, RVT is the 
main trace that does anything and it pulls out some but not all of the apparent 
global physiological noise in the data.  I would say the physiological traces 
are useful for understanding various aspects of the data in the context of data 
cleanup and sources of artifacts, but given that they are not available for all 
datasets and do an imperfect job at removing the physiological noise we'll need 
another method for general physiological noise cleanup of HCP data.

Peace,

Matt.

From: 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of "Hodge, Michael" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 2:07 PM
To: "Harms, Michael" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Miriam 
Klein-Flügge 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Participants with good physiological data


Hi Miriam,

Mike Harms is correct that the files haven't been QC'd.  They have, however, 
gone through a minimal automated process that checks that the files are of 
reasonable length and that we have the trigger pulses that should allow for the 
data to be reliably matched to the imaging sequence.  When those conditions 
aren't met, the files aren't produced.  That's why there are a fairly high 
percentage of subjects without physio data.  To help you find subjects with 
data, I've attached a list of physio files I pulled from the drive we use for 
syncing with Amazon S3 and making Connectome-in-a-Box.

Regards,

Mike



From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Harms, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 9:10 AM
To: Miriam Klein-Flügge 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Participants with good physiological data


Hi,
We have not QC'ed the physiological traces.  If you start working with that 
data, we would appreciate it if you could give us feedback on your experience.

cheers,
-MH

--
Michael Harms, Ph.D.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders
Washington University School of Medicine
Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134
660 South Euclid Ave. Tel: 314-747-6173
St. Louis, MO  63110 Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

From: 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of Miriam Klein-Flügge 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 at 8:52 AM
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [HCP-Users] Participants with good physiological data

Dear all,

I wondered whether there is any documentation about which participants have 
good physiological monitoring data. I may have missed this somewhere but all I 
managed to do is to download an entire subjects' unprocessed rfMRI dataset to 
see if their folder contains the physio regressors in the "LINKED_DATA" folder 
(then I know at least whether they exist, not necessarily whether they are 
good). Is there a way to avoid having to download and then delete the ones that 
don't?

Thanks,
Miriam



--

Miriam Klein-Flügge

Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Experimental Psychology

University of Oxford

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to