Hi, We don’t have separate lists of all the files in each package for every subject. This seems to be a bigger request that we initially appreciated, so the Informatics group will likely have to give some thought if this is something they want to support.
cheers, -MH -- Michael Harms, Ph.D. ----------------------------------------------------------- Conte Center for the Neuroscience of Mental Disorders Washington University School of Medicine Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134 660 South Euclid Ave.Tel: 314-747-6173 St. Louis, MO 63110Email: [email protected] On 12/6/16, 3:46 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of Yaroslav Halchenko" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Thank you Michael and Jennifer again! On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Elam, Jennifer wrote: > To add to what Mike Harms just wrote, it still sounds like you are > thinking of the packages as data bundles for groups of subjects. yes -- indeed -- it was probably the main reason for a bit of disconnect in our dialog since I have misused the term of a "package" which is indeed provided per each subject separately and "bundle" would have been a proper term. I will try to use correct terms (package vs bundle) appropriately from now on ;) On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Elam, Jennifer wrote: > Subjects > don't "belong" to a package because the packages don't contain groups >of > subjects. Instead, the packages are separate and specific to a >particular > subject ID, modality, processing level, and smoothing level (for >fMRI). On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Harms, Michael wrote: > To reiterate something Mike Hodge mentioned, any given package only > contains files for one subject. When interacting with ConnectomDB, the > subjects to download, and the particular packages to download, are two > separate and distinct choices. choices (as in the interface) are indeed distinct but not entirely independent. With my cleared up understanding of the terminology, question remains -- is there a list of files per each package (per each subject) which you use to generate packages from individual files? or that is the information contained within XNAT schema used underneath (so it could may be queried instead)? > I think the confusion is that individual subject packages can be >queued > for download in groups in ConnectomeDB. We could provide you with >lists of > subjects for each searchable group in ConnectomeDB, (e.g. U100, 7T >data > available, MEG data available) with which some users may have queued >all > subjects in a group for download of specific data packages for their > analysis. yes. That would be great. > Another slight complication is that there is a little bit of overlap >in > the data in the packages themselves so that there is more than one >package > associated with some of the files. This was done so that users would >have > everything they need to do a certain analysis from a particular > package. For example, the FIX and FIX-extended packages include a few >of > the same output files, although the FIX-extended package has a lot >more of > the FIX intermediate files to allow users to evaluate how FIX worked >for a > particular subject. yeap. that is why having lists of those files per each package could be of benefit. Could as well be located e.g. under packages/ "subfolder" within each subject folder on S3 bucket, e.g. for ./100307/analysis_s12/100307_3T_tfMRI_EMOTION_analysis_s12.zip there could be files like ./100307/packages/3T_tfMRI_EMOTION_analysis_s12.list containing 100307/.xdlm/100307_3T_tfMRI_EMOTION_analysis_s12.json 100307/MNINonLinear/Results/tfMRI_EMOTION/tfMRI_EMOTION_hp200_s12_level2.f eat/100307_tfMRI_EMOTION_level2_hp200_s12.dscalar.nii 100307/MNINonLinear/Results/tfMRI_EMOTION/tfMRI_EMOTION_hp200_s12_level2.f eat/Contrasts.txt 100307/MNINonLinear/Results/tfMRI_EMOTION/tfMRI_EMOTION_hp200_s12_level2.f eat/GrayordinatesStats/cope1.feat/cope1.dtseries.nii 100307/MNINonLinear/Results/tfMRI_EMOTION/tfMRI_EMOTION_hp200_s12_level2.f eat/GrayordinatesStats/cope1.feat/logfile 100307/MNINonLinear/Results/tfMRI_EMOTION/tfMRI_EMOTION_hp200_s12_level2.f eat/GrayordinatesStats/cope1.feat/mask.dtseries.nii ... ... (excluded folders since they provide no additional information) ... do you see it feasible? Thank you in advance for your informative replies! -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users ________________________________ The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
