I think that means that one session was with one recon and the other with another recon.
Peace, Matt. From: Joelle Zimmermann <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 1:50 PM To: Matt Glasser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] comparison across acquisitions One more question about this - a few subjects have: r177 r227 for the fMRI recon. Does this mean both were done? Which of the two was used for these subjects for the S900 release? Thanks, Joelle On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Glasser, Matthew <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Yes. Peace, Matt. From: Joelle Zimmermann <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 1:03 PM To: Matt Glasser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] comparison across acquisitions Thanks Michael and Matt. Were they all collected at the same site? If not, I'd expect this to make some difference. On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Glasser, Matthew <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: It is a variable in the .csv you download out of the database. Diffusion isn’t affected by this, just fMRI because diffusion was processed with the same recon version (old scans were reprocessed). Peace, Matt. From: Joelle Zimmermann <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 12:58 PM To: Matt Glasser <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] comparison across acquisitions Thanks for your reply Matt. By version number, do you mean the "acquisition" - that is, the Q#? So you expect the fMRI to be more different across acquisitions than the diffusion? Do you recall at which acquisition the image reconstruction version change occurred? Joelle On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Glasser, Matthew <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: The main thing to consider was a an image reconstruction version change that occurred relatively early in the project. Diffusion data were retroreconned (and so all data have the same version), but fMRI raw data had not been saved and could not be retroreconned. We advise using a covariate of no interest for version number. Peace, Matt. From: <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Joelle Zimmermann <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 12:48 PM To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [HCP-Users] comparison across acquisitions Hi HCPers, I'm working with structural and functional connectomes from the S900 HCP. I'm wondering how the different acquisitions (ie Q1 Q2 etc) and releases would affect comparison across all SCs for example. Was data collected at different sites for example? - which may affect comparison across acquisitions. See below info pasted from behaviour spreadsheet. Do I understand correctly the "Release" column is when subjects were first released. but if i am getting all data from the S900, then I shouldn't care about this first release? Thanks, Joelle Subject Release Acquisition 100004 S900 Q06 100206 S900 Q11 100307 Q1 Q01 100408 Q3 Q03 100610 S900 Q08 101006 S500 Q06 101107 S500 Q06 101309 S500 Q06 101410 S500 Q06 101612 S900 Q11 101915 Q3 Q04 _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users ________________________________ The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. ________________________________ The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. ________________________________ The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. ________________________________ The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
