Dear HCP Users,

A frequently discussed topic on the HCP-Users mailing list is how to clean HCP 
fMRI data above and beyond the recommended spatial ICA + FIX cleanup that has 
already been carried out.  Several papers have noted that there is residual 
structured noise in HCP data and have suggested that global signal regression 
is needed to remove this noise.  At the same time, it is known that there are 
downsides to global signal regression in that it will also remove global (or 
semi-global) neural signal in addition to global noise.  For this reason I and 
others have recommended using partial correlation, or if full correlation is 
required, that analyses be run with and without global signal regression to 
assess whether results are consistent across the two approaches and are not due 
to either global noise or the removal of global neural signal.  If the desired 
output is full correlation; however, this is not an ideal solution.

I have just posted on BioRxiv 
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/09/27/193862 a manuscript that 
describes a method to get around this problem.  We use temporal ICA to 
decompose the fMRI data into temporally independent components, allowing us to 
separate global signal and global noise components.  Temporal ICA works for 
global components because it aims to maximize temporal independence, rather 
than spatial independence (it is hard to make global spatial maps uncorrelated 
with all other components as is required by spatial ICA).  We then regress the 
temporal ICA noise components out of the fMRI data and show that this removes 
residual global noise in the HCP data.  Should the manuscript successfully 
navigate peer review, we will use the method to clean the HCP fMRI data and 
make the code available in the HCP Pipelines.  The method works at the group 
level, rather than the individual subject level, and would run after the HCP’s 
spatial minimal preprocessing pipelines, ICA+FIX, and MSMAll.

We are sharing this manuscript as a preprint ahead of peer review so that the 
community is alerted to this new approach to the global noise dilemma and to 
solicit feedback about the work.  The topic of global signal regression has 
engendered strong opinions on both sides of the debate, including within the 
HCP consortium.  The manuscript acknowledges that the positions on both sides 
have merits and limitations, but proposes a data driven best of both worlds 
approach.

Matt.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to