The best thing to do would be to not do VBM. Instead I would recommend looking for changes in cortical thickness or surface area.
Peace, Matt. From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>> on behalf of "Gilman, Jodi" <jgilm...@mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:jgilm...@mgh.harvard.edu>> Date: Friday, December 15, 2017 at 10:47 AM To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>> Subject: [HCP-Users] Best structural image for VBM? Hello, I am interested in doing a VBM analysis- which structural images would be best for this? I am currently using 3T_T1w_MPR1.nii.gz, which look very good. But I’d like to confirm that these are best. Thanks, Jodi The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
