Hi Christopher, Higher scores should indicate better performance on the NIH Toolbox cognition tests. The scores should have a mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15 as normed against the nationally representative NIH Toolbox normative sample. More details on the scoring are available in the NIH Toolbox Scoring and Interpretation Guide<https://wustl.box.com/s/64qg76xll2wesvql53vl6eypny0oezm3> that was in place in 2012 when HCP-Young Adult started collecting participant data .
Best, Jenn Jennifer Elam, Ph.D. Scientific Outreach, Human Connectome Project Washington University School of Medicine Department of Neuroscience, Box 8108 660 South Euclid Avenue St. Louis, MO 63110 314-362-9387<tel:314-362-9387> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> www.humanconnectome.org<http://www.humanconnectome.org/> ________________________________ From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Weise, Christopher <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 9:59:20 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [HCP-Users] NIH-Toolbox Dear HCP Team, Am I right with the presumption that for all NIH toolbox measures of cognitive function higher scores indicate better performance? I’m getting somewhat paradoxical results when looking at some of the cognitive measures (i.e. Flanker and DCST) so I just want to double-check… Thanks for your help and all your great work! Chris _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
