Hi - this order:
ff{1}=sprintf('%s/%d/MNINonLinear/Results/rfMRI_REST1_LR/rfMRI_REST1_LR_Atlas_MSMAll_hp2000_clean.dtseries.nii',SUBJECTS,subID);
ff{2}=sprintf('%s/%d/MNINonLinear/Results/rfMRI_REST1_RL/rfMRI_REST1_RL_Atlas_MSMAll_hp2000_clean.dtseries.nii',SUBJECTS,subID);
ff{3}=sprintf('%s/%d/MNINonLinear/Results/rfMRI_REST2_LR/rfMRI_REST2_LR_Atlas_MSMAll_hp2000_clean.dtseries.nii',SUBJECTS,subID);
ff{4}=sprintf('%s/%d/MNINonLinear/Results/rfMRI_REST2_RL/rfMRI_REST2_RL_Atlas_MSMAll_hp2000_clean.dtseries.nii',SUBJECTS,subID);
cheers.
> On 22 Aug 2018, at 22:04, Julie Tseng <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> In the rfMRI Parcellation-Timeseries-Netmats (PTN) extensively processed
> rfMRI dataset, the node timeseries are provided with all four resting state
> runs concatenated for each participant. What was the order in which the 3T
> resting state runs were concatenated for this result?
>
> Thanks for your help!
> Julie
>
> --
> Julie Tseng
> M.Sc Neuroscience (Candidate 2019)
> B.ASc Mathematics & Engineering, Class of 2017
> POPMEM Computational Memory Lab
> Centre for Neuroscience Studies
> Queen’s University
> _______________________________________________
> HCP-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Head of Analysis, WIN (FMRIB) Oxford
FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 610470
[email protected] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stop the cultural destruction of Tibet
_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
