What are the changes to the headers that you need?

-----
Mike Jackson                      www.bluequartz.net
Principal Software Engineer       [email protected]
BlueQuartz Software               Dayton, Ohio

On Aug 4, 2010, at 20:41, Jesse Lai <[email protected]> wrote:

> This question is aimed at the members of the HDFGroup and also to the 
> community that uses the HDF5DotNet wrappers.  I've seen a lot of traffic 
> lately on questions about functionality that does not exist in the wrappers 
> released with the initial release of HDF5 1.8.0.  It has been noted that 
> these wrappers were funded by a customer who did not require the full 
> functionality.  Therefore, not all of the functions exist.  There are several 
> useful ones that are currently not included.  Additionally, it is clearly 
> stated in the documentation that these wrappers are a prototype and are not 
> officially supported.
>
> As a side project, I've been doing some work to the HDF5DotNet source code to 
> add some of these functions along with unit tests for the library to make 
> sure things are working.  I personally did not like the style in which the 
> wrappers were written because it didn't conform to the .NET standard method 
> of capitalization and other things.  So I have updated my version of the 
> library to change these things.
>
> The question to the HDFGroup is this: what does the future hold for the 
> HDF5DotNet wrappers?  Is it something that might officially become a product 
> that gets regular updates, or will it always just be the prototype wrappers?  
> The main reason I ask is because I would like to see the ability to have a 
> public source code repository where updates could be made to the wrapper 
> source code.  Does the HDFGroup have a Subversion repository that they would 
> be willing to let the community use so that we could develop the HDF5DotNet 
> library further?  Or as another option, a public open source project site 
> like Sourceforge could be used for the same purpose.  I'd be willing to use 
> my source code as the base because I prefer the styling.  However, be aware 
> that because of the naming changes I've made that it wouldn't be a drop in 
> replacement to the current implementation of the HDF5DotNet wrapper.
>
> I'd appreciate any feedback from the community and the HDFGroup on this 
> subject.  It seems that there could be some progress made on improving the 
> library from the community, we just need a place for people to contribute 
> and/or access the latest code.  I'd vote for creating a Sourceforge project 
> and going down that route, but I don't know if there are any restrictions in 
> place from the HDFGroup.
>
> As a side note, there are some very minor modifications that could be made to 
> future versions of the header files that get released with the HDF5 binaries 
> that would greatly simplify updates to the HDF5DotNet wrappers.  It would not 
> affect normal building of the HDF5 library either.  It would be really great 
> if that could get included.
>
> Regards,
> Jesse
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
> [email protected]
> http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org

_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org

Reply via email to