Hi Andrey, Thank you for reporting the problem. On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:39 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> Hi, > > I suppose you might be interested to see the results of backward binary > compatibility tests for libhdf5 [1]. I've got the request from Debian > maintainers to add this library to the tracker. Hope it may be useful for you > too. > > I see the one very dangerous change in the libhdf5 binary interface between > 1.8.5 and 1.8.6 versions [2], but the soname was not bumped: the value of > H5T_ORDER_NONE member has been changed from 3 to 4 in the H5T_order_t > enumeration type (i.e. old apps execute H5T_ORDER_MIXED instead of NONE). Applications shouldn't use numbers, but you are correct about the soname version. Will fix. Elena > > BTW > The tests were performed by the ACC tool [3]. > > [1] Test results for HDF5 > [2] libhdf5: 1.8.5 to 1.8.6 binary compatibility report > [3] ABI Compliance Checker (ACC) > > -- > Andrey Ponomarenko > Department for Operating Systems at ISPRAS > web: http://www.LinuxTesting.org > mail: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion. > [email protected] > http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org
_______________________________________________ Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion. [email protected] http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org
