>> Have you tried using the MPI-POSIX VFD for independent access?

>Thanks  - I'll report back with further findings

Rubbish! I still only get 150MB/s with the mpiposix driver.

As Queen Victoria would have said "we are not amused"

I suspect I've got an error somewhere because something should have changed.

JB


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Mark Howison
Sent: 05 April 2011 17:19
To: HDF Users Discussion List
Subject: Re: [Hdf-forum] Chunking : was Howison et al Lustre mdc_config

Hi John,

What platform and parallel file system is this on? Have you tried
using the MPI-POSIX VFD for independent access?

Thanks,
Mark

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. <[email protected]> wrote:
> Elena,
>
> I was just replying to myself when your email came in.
> I knocked up a quick wrapper to enable testing of the cache eviction stuff so 
> I'm happy (ish).
>
> However : I'm seeing puzzling behaviour with chunking.
> Using collective IO, (tweaking various params) I see transfer rates from 
> 1GB/s to 3GB/s depending on stripe size, number of cb_nodes, etc.
>
> However, when using chunking with independent IO, I set stripe size to 6MB, 
> chunk dims to match the 6MB, each node is writing 6MB, alignment is set to 
> 6MB intervals and I've followed all the tips I can find. I see (for 512 nodes 
> writing 6MB each = 4GB total) a max throughput of around 150MB/s.
>
> This is shockingly slow compared to collective IO and I'm quite surprised. 
> I've been playing with this for a few days now and my general impression is 
> that
> chunking = rubbish
> collective = nice
>
> I did not expect chunking to be so bad compared to collective (which is a 
> shame as I was hoping to use it for compression etc).
>
> Can anyone suggest further tweaks that  I should be looking out for to 
> change. (one thing for example that seems to make no difference is the 
> H5Pset_istore_k(fcpl, btree_ik); stuff. I still don't quite know what the 
> correct value for btree_ik is. Ive read the man page, but I'm puzzled as to 
> the correct meaning. if I know there will be 512 chunks, what is the 'right' 
> value of btree_ik?
>
> Any clues gratefully received for optimizing chunking. I hoped the thread 
> about 30,000 processes would carry on as I found it interesting to follow.
>
> ttfn
>
> JB
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Elena Pourmal
> Sent: 05 April 2011 17:01
> To: HDF Users Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [Hdf-forum] Question re: Howison et al Lustre mdc_config tuning 
> recommendations
>
> Hi John,
> On Apr 5, 2011, at 4:21 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. wrote:
>
>>>>>  H5AC_cache_config_t mdc_config;
>>>>>  hid_t file_id;
>>>>>  file_id = H5Fopen("file.h5", H5ACC_RDWR, H5P_DEFAULT);
>>>>>  mdc_config.version = H5AC__CURR_CACHE_CONFIG_VERSION;
>>>>>  H5Pget_mdc_config(file_id, &mdc_config)
>>>>>  mdc_config.evictions_enabled = 0 /* FALSE */;
>>>>>  mdc_config.incr_mode = H5C_incr__off;
>>>>>  mdc_config.decr_mode = H5C_decr__off;
>>>>>  H5Pset_mdc_config(file_id, &mdc_config);
>>
>> I couldn't find fortran bindings for these. Do they exist in any recent 
>> releases or svn branches.
>>
> Fortran wrappers for do not exist. Please let us know which Fortran wrappers 
> do you need and we will add them to our to-do list.
>
> Elena
>> thanks
>>
>> JB
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
> [email protected]
> http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
> [email protected]
> http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org
>

_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org

_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org

_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org

Reply via email to