Hi Matt,

On Aug 19, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Matthew Chambers wrote:

> Sorry I wasn't clear. That's 1.9mb of just HDF5. The total .exe size went 
> from 3.9 to 5.8mb.
> 
> Preprocessor defines could disable parts of the code that perhaps aren't 
> necessary for general functionality.

        What platform are you building on?  Are you using a debug or production 
build of HDF5?

        Quincey

> 
> -Matt
> 
> 
> On 8/19/2011 9:39 AM, Daniel Kahn wrote:
>> Greetings Matt,
>> 
>> Matthew Chambers wrote:
>>> 
>>> We're statically linking our binaries to HDF5 (called via the C++ bindings) 
>>> and it's somewhat
>>> disturbing how big the compiled code is (about ~1.9mb).
>> Why do you find this disturbing? How big a file did you expect?
>> 
>>> Are there preprocessor defines that will reduce this significantly?
>> Hmmm, why would you expect this to work? I would expect just the 
>> opposite--i.e. that /defines/ will
>> bloat the executable.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> --dan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
> [email protected]
> http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org


_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://mail.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_hdfgroup.org

Reply via email to